Walking Liberty Grading- By Photograde

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by BigTee44, Nov 29, 2013.

  1. BigTee44

    BigTee44 Well-Known Member

    Alright, so I'm trying to determine if this coin is a F or a VF, the front looks like a nice VF20/30, but the back, according to Photograde could be a low F or maybe even a VG....

    What do you think?

    1923-S
    55.jpg

    edited - copyright


    I know the skirt lines in the early years before 1921 was different, but it's still hard to determine the grade by using the pictures in this book.

    What do you think, fine or very fine?
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 29, 2013
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    To me that's an F12.
     
  4. WLH22

    WLH22 Well-Known Member

    I agree F12.
     
  5. bsowa1029

    bsowa1029 Franklin Half Addict

    Comparing the photos provided to PCGS photograde, I agree with the two above me. Might go F15 on a good day.
     
    Last edited: Nov 29, 2013
    imrich likes this.
  6. Mr. Flute

    Mr. Flute Well-Known Member

    The wear on the obverse is enough to put the coin at VG-10.
     
  7. jloring

    jloring Senior Citizen

    Except it matches the wear on a VF-20 in the photograde examples.
     
    BigTee44 likes this.
  8. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    IMO, the wear is very close to the F12. I could not strongly disagree with F15, but the details are not as strong as the VF20 shown.
     
  9. jloring

    jloring Senior Citizen

    Well, here's a VF-20 example that I sold recently (maybe it has less wear, or is it just ANACS overgrading?):

    walkervf.JPG walkervf1.JPG walkervf2.JPG
     
  10. Tom B

    Tom B TomB Everywhere Else

    No way, no how is the coin posted in the OP a VF.
     
  11. silverfool

    silverfool Active Member

    I've seen some pretty crappy '21-21d-21s coins grade vf. maybe they go easier on the early years? the OP coin is a maybe vf, not that I agree but it might grade that.
     
  12. BigTee44

    BigTee44 Well-Known Member

    So the coin used in the Photograde book are not a good example of what a VF20 should look like then?
     
  13. silentnviolent

    silentnviolent accumulator--selling--make an offer I can't refuse

    This may help.....
    image.jpg
     
  14. rzage

    rzage What Goes Around Comes Around .

    I'm in the F-12 group . Still a nice looking coin . Walkers wear well in my opinion .
     
  15. jloring

    jloring Senior Citizen

    Tom... do you think the ANACS coin I posted is a VF-20? I don't.
     
  16. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    Trying to grade any coin by comparing it to the photographs of another coin is an effort in futility. This is because you can have a 100 coins all graded the same, and graded correctly, and yet all of them will look slightly different than the others.

    Grading must be done based on a set of written standards, and each individual coin must be graded based on its own merits or lack thereof. Every coin in any grade is unique.
     
  17. Tom B

    Tom B TomB Everywhere Else

    What I am writing is that the coin shared in the first post is not consistent with how the ANA Grading Guide would grade a VF WLH, is not consistent with how I would grade a VF WLH and is not consistent with my experience in how PCGS would grade a VF WLH. It looks like an F. I'll post a few images later of slightly older WLHs that are already graded by PCGS and that are more in line with how I would grade coins.
     
  18. Tom B

    Tom B TomB Everywhere Else

    Here are three early WLHs where I agree with the grade and they are in the same basic grade range-

    1916-S PCGS F15/CAC-
    I recently sold this coin from my website, so I would not have possession of it if you had any questions about its surfaces or color.

    [​IMG]

    1916-S PCGS VF25/CAC-

    [​IMG]

    1921 PCGS VF25/CAC OGH-
    Truly, I think this coin is undergraded and would be more accurately portrayed in a VF30 holder.

    [​IMG]
     
    rzage likes this.
  19. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    Only thing I would add is that Walkers dated prior to 1921 are graded on a more lenient set of standards than the rest.
     
    Tom B likes this.
  20. Tom B

    Tom B TomB Everywhere Else

    In terms of visible skirt lines that is definitely true, but for overall details of the remainder of the coins I am not so certain there is much difference.
     
  21. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    I agree. The skirt lines on Walkers, and the hand of course, are the type of things that should be used for special designations regarding quality of strike. They are much more indicative of a good strike than any of the other things used for special designations on other coins. But Walkers don't even have a special designation.

    For example, a Jeff can have full steps and still have a terrible strike. The things that were chosen to indicate quality of strike special designations makes no sense.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page