Can anybody venture a grade for this 1917 WLH?

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Eduard, Nov 28, 2013.

  1. Eduard

    Eduard Supporter**

    I am just curious. I do not collect modern US coins, but this one came very cheap in a lot of other US coins.
    Care to venture a grade based on those photos? DCAM0021.JPG DCAM0024.JPG
    Thanks!
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Sean the Coin Collector

    Sean the Coin Collector Active Member

    I think this many be an AU example, i can't tell from the images but their many be a cleaning on this piece it is very hard to tell!!
     
  4. ffrickey

    ffrickey Junior Member

    Looks very nice to me, I'd say an AU for sure.
     
  5. TIF

    TIF Always learning.

  6. green18

    green18 Unknown member Sweet on Commemorative Coins

    Based on the photos, XF-45........
     
  7. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    I'll guess AU as well. It looks to have a bit of green tint in the image. PVC? Might need an acetone bath.
     
  8. -jeffB

    -jeffB Greshams LEO Supporter

    I'd like to see a larger/closer shot of the date. That feature on the left of the second 1 in the date makes me nervous -- it reminds me of a Chinese counterfeit 1920-S that nearly took me in.

    The counterfeit I got was attracted to a magnet. Have you checked this one?
     
  9. kaosleeroy108

    kaosleeroy108 The Mahayana Tea Shop & hobby center

    im going to say xf45 cleaned its got little contact at all but he reverse breast is dull
     
  10. silverfool

    silverfool Active Member

    I'll go with an AU. the early Walkers weren't struck wit as fine a detail as later years. might or might not be cleaned, hard to tell from the pic.
     
  11. Eduard

    Eduard Supporter**

    Thanks for al your replies. I realize this is a terrible picture, so it is difficult to judge what the condition is. I'll try to take better shots of the coin (just need to remember where i put it).
     
  12. jloring

    jloring Senior Citizen

    I agree... I would venture counterfeit from those images... and I say that with almost 100% certainty. I've seen a lot of fake walkers with identical features. This came "cheap" because that's what it is.. fake. Sorry.
     
  13. Eduard

    Eduard Supporter**

    Now my interest has been piqued. I'm usually petty good as spotting fakes, but will bow to superior knowledge. It was in a lot which contained an 1813 CBH, 1842 O (large date), 1854 O seated half, and a few more. It cost me around $ 15-20.
    I'll get a better picture and post soon as I can. Thanks for your opinions.
     
  14. green18

    green18 Unknown member Sweet on Commemorative Coins

    This what all the brouhaha is about?

    DCAM0021.JPG
     
  15. green18

    green18 Unknown member Sweet on Commemorative Coins

    I borrowed this from an ebay auction........

    $T2eC16dHJH!FFl4wy-U(BRlUunL-yQ~~60_57.JPG
     
  16. 40_mila_kokkina

    40_mila_kokkina Active Member

  17. jloring

    jloring Senior Citizen

    Yep... it's an ugly fake. But, I guess you can still grade a fake if you want to, lol.
     
  18. green18

    green18 Unknown member Sweet on Commemorative Coins

    Anyone know how many die pairs they used for the '17?
     
  19. 40_mila_kokkina

    40_mila_kokkina Active Member

    Hard to know a fake unless you see it in person. Photos can make a coin look different from what it is tangibly.
     
  20. jloring

    jloring Senior Citizen

    Of course it can... but it can't conceal the obvious; and in this case, the odds are overwhelming that this coin is a current Chinese copy.
     
  21. 40_mila_kokkina

    40_mila_kokkina Active Member

    I agree. I notice the rim looks wrong and so does the eagle's eye.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page