Holy cow!!

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by cremebrule, Jul 19, 2013.

  1. Type2

    Type2 Type2

    Looks very nice and are you going to send it in for grading?
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. cremebrule

    cremebrule Active Member

    Hi all,

    Just as an update; it's been sent to Robec and here are the pictures he took of the coin:

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  4. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    WOW. Robec can really catch the color. Great images.
     
  5. petro89

    petro89 Member

  6. Rickipedia

    Rickipedia Korean YN at 12

    Truly lovely indeed....
     
  7. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    My opinion has not changed. The coin is very pretty but the toning is questionable and not market acceptable.
     
  8. seasnake

    seasnake Junior Member

    In the past year I have sent in 4 Kennedy halves of which 2 came out of mint sets and 2 were raw, picked up on the bay. All had great toning and I feared the worst, all came back graded (NGC) so I would send it in, beautiful coin pickup.
     
  9. Patrick King

    Patrick King Well-Known Member

    this coins toning pattern looks very similar to the PCGs photograde ms68 example. Furthermore, I've never had a problem getting a toner graded that had the same scratchy toning pattern that I see around "states". I think it has a very good chance of grading.
     
    petro89 likes this.
  10. petro89

    petro89 Member

    Yeah... this is a toughie, but if I did have to pick one I would say NT...moreso because of the pattern than the colors (they are wild but not so wild that they are out of the question). I honestly think it has a better than 50/50 chance to grade cleanly. I wish I had taken the chance...thats for sure! ;)
     
  11. Cazkaboom

    Cazkaboom One for all, all for me.

    I'm going to comment once more. Upon the new photos. The toning looks very NT to me. Splotches of color, elevation differences in color, and especially the mottling in D STATES OF really gets to show NT as it is really hard to mimic that. But It looks... How do I say it... Super NT to the point of it looking exaggerated. I am on the fence on a clean grade or not, but the OP didn't say anything about grading (I think) So I hope he enjoys it as is. It is truly beautiful.
     
    petro89 likes this.
  12. cremebrule

    cremebrule Active Member

    I ended up submitting the coin to PCGS via robec...it took a couple tries, but it finally graded! Anyone care to guess the grade? :)

    67-1.jpg
     
    TypicalCreepahx, geekpryde and NOS like this.
  13. JPeace$

    JPeace$ Coinaholic

    MS65, possible 66.
     
  14. C-B-D

    C-B-D Well-Known Member

  15. petro89

    petro89 Member

    I'm going with 65
     
  16. cremebrule

    cremebrule Active Member

    The coin was deemed MS62! Presumably for the slight rub and lack of booming luster on the obverse.

    [​IMG]
     
  17. cpm9ball

    cpm9ball CANNOT RE-MEMBER

    Toning doesn't "flake off". It appears that the fingerprint was there, first, and it toned over it.

    Chris
     
    NOS likes this.
  18. geekpryde

    geekpryde Husband and Father Moderator


    Wow, I was thinking 65. Still a great coin.
     
    NOS likes this.
  19. JPeace$

    JPeace$ Coinaholic

    Shocked it's only a 62! The obverse luster must be very dull.
     
  20. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    I think they graded it MS62 as a silent net grade due to the questionable nature of the toning.
     
  21. MrDSmith

    MrDSmith Senior Member

    One thing that I've noticed with AT is that it covers an entire obverse or reverse when present and the colors are even more fluorescent. The break in the toning pattern on the reverse was the give away for me that it was natural.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page