Proofs??

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by heuvy31, Oct 31, 2013.

  1. heuvy31

    heuvy31 Active Member

    I am still trying to get a grasp on identifying some of these earlier proofs. I've been trying to identify proofs by the squared edges but can't seem to do that.

    I am thinking the 64 is a proof but wanted to make sure. The 63d seems mirror like, but I wasn't sure if it was an actual proof or not. Lastly, I know there were no nickel proofs made between 43-49 but the 43s definitely has some mirror like aspects, especially in hand. Is there any possibility this was somehow made as a proof? Any help on these would be great.
    coins 160.jpg coins 163.jpg coins 164.jpg coins 168.jpg
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. heuvy31

    heuvy31 Active Member

  4. Galen59

    Galen59 Gott helfe mir

    no.
     
    heuvy31 likes this.
  5. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    The 1943-S has a big scratch on the obverse and has altered surfaces. It is definitely not a proof.
     
    heuvy31 likes this.
  6. heuvy31

    heuvy31 Active Member

    Thank you both for the replies
     
  7. rzage

    rzage What Goes Around Comes Around .

    The best way to learn about proofs is to actually see a lot of them , then you can see how sharp the rims and the devices are . The best places are coin shops and shows , but you can also see a lot of them on the auction sites . Heritage has great pics of all sorts of coins from circulation strikes to proofs . It's free to join and they have a wealth of knowledge for learning to see how the tpgs grade and prices paid . To get there go to www.ha.com/
     
    green18 and heuvy31 like this.
  8. heuvy31

    heuvy31 Active Member

    Thank you for the advice rzage, that is a great idea. I will definitely check out the photos on heritage.
     
  9. Tom B

    Tom B TomB Everywhere Else

    Proofs were not made in Denver in 1963; they were only made in Philadelphia. Tidbits of information such as that are readily obtained in the Red Book, which can be a surprisingly useful book to own.
     
    Collect89 and heuvy31 like this.
  10. Conder101

    Conder101 Numismatist

    I think the 64 could be a mis-handled proof. The 63-D is not, the 43-S has been polished.
     
    Collect89 and heuvy31 like this.
  11. Treashunt

    Treashunt The Other Frank

    '64 No
    '63 Post mint polished, NO Plus it is a D mint.
    '43 S, post mint polished
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page