1942 S Mercury- double S or S stamped on a D?

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by R_rabbit, Jan 26, 2023.

  1. R_rabbit

    R_rabbit Well-Known Member

    7ED04187-7F6E-4906-AB41-0EDCD203DE62.jpeg F0F8A9B2-A8E7-4098-B9E1-D2837D836922.jpeg 1979C34A-189C-4102-8089-341DB1078686.jpeg 547ACB35-69CC-40D0-B7E0-793CC78AA9A0.jpeg 44931A76-20D3-4165-AB13-27E109C838B7.jpeg 43D8B5D5-401A-4A9B-9319-455EED01457D.jpeg A9FE7E83-37B7-4C0F-B4BB-D59CF094FF24.jpeg Hello everyone :)
    I am having trouble trying to figure this one out. 1942 S mercury dime. It appears to be double stamped or possibly a S on top of a D mint mark?
    It has uncirculated details.
    Also is there an extra wing? Or possibly another image? I am stumped
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Noah Worke

    Noah Worke Well-Known Member

    I'm not a variety person so I'm not the guy to ask, but I don't see anything that looks like a "D" under the S, so if anything my (non-expert) opinion is that it would be an "S".
     
    Spark1951 likes this.
  4. expat

    expat Remember you are unique, just like everyone else Supporter

    There were two mintmark styles used for 1942. Trumpet tail (MMS 004) and straight serifs (MMS 005). Of the six known RPM's 5 are trumpet tail and 1 is straight serifs. Your coin has MMS 005 and does not match the known example and the MM is in a different position (not near enough to the leaf).
    The way the devices have been narrowed and that the E has the same look suggests that machine doubling or die deterioration is the cause. Bear in mind that the MM was handpunched into the die after the hubbing of the die was completed, having the same characterisitics of other devices is also an indication that it is not a re-punched mintmark.
     
  5. Spark1951

    Spark1951 Accomplishment, not Activity

    This is not uncirculated. On the obverse there appears to be flattening of the hair in the very center and slight wear on the wing.

    On the reverse there is very definite flattening of both top and bottom horizontal split-bars to the point of occlusion. Also definite flattening of the lower diagonal bar across the fasces. In the very center the split-bar is completely worn to no split showing.

    I believe this is handling/stacking damage from storage in a tube or roll.

    …imo…Spark
     
    Last edited: Jan 26, 2023
  6. charley

    charley Well-Known Member

    5X to screen has appearance of PM damage, to me.
     
  7. charley

    charley Well-Known Member

    Concur, and some obvious hits on obverse and reverse, and gouge and light scratches.
     
  8. R_rabbit

    R_rabbit Well-Known Member

    it does appear to have scratches but there’s black fibers that got in between the plastic film of the holder.lol
    The hair is a bit flattened. Perhaps from being in a coin roll. Overall still a nice coin for the year ;)
     
    Spark1951 likes this.
  9. Treashunt

    Treashunt The Other Frank

    Whenever you take pictures, take the coin out of the holder.

    Or take the pictures before you put it in the holder.

    It distorts the image
     
    R_rabbit, SensibleSal66 and charley like this.
  10. R_rabbit

    R_rabbit Well-Known Member

    it is a misaligned strike or( Mad) it is a mms-005. My pictures are terrible. The mint mark just looks off to me.. here’s one more pic for fun B76495DF-B260-4FD4-BC45-06362C5F64DB.jpeg 3D7B09AA-537F-48B7-B660-2C62ABCBC4FC.jpeg
     
  11. R_rabbit

    R_rabbit Well-Known Member

    Also, thank you all very much. Greatly appreciate all your help.
     
    Cheech9712 likes this.
  12. Paddy54

    Paddy54 Well-Known Member

  13. expat

    expat Remember you are unique, just like everyone else Supporter

    R_rabbit likes this.
  14. Paddy54

    Paddy54 Well-Known Member

    I think a die chip or md
     
  15. R_rabbit

    R_rabbit Well-Known Member

    thank you:) it does look like an rpm-006. Yes really bad photos lol
     
  16. enamel7

    enamel7 Junior Member

    I think the other poster was telling you that that it's not RPM-006.
     
  17. Cheech9712

    Cheech9712 Every thing is a guess

    R_rabbit likes this.
  18. R_rabbit

    R_rabbit Well-Known Member

    yes that chin looks interesting …
    It’s not pointed and a few micro meters up?
     
  19. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    Your MM is not an RPM. The MM does not have the correct MM placement of any attributed.
    What you see is small die chips.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page