1964 quarter rpm?

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by kelleef, May 25, 2013.

  1. kelleef

    kelleef Member

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. jello

    jello Not Expert★NormL®

    It sure looks like Rpm#3.
     
  4. kelleef

    kelleef Member

    Thank you jello any premium
     
  5. cmc86413

    cmc86413 Member

    Rpm# 3 I believe, I would have to see the whole coin to get an idea of the value.
     
  6. kelleef

    kelleef Member

  7. cmc86413

    cmc86413 Member

  8. kelleef

    kelleef Member

  9. 1amthe1

    1amthe1 Country Boy

    There is a transitional error for the 64 D. Here is the link, give me a like if it helps. http://www.doubleddie.com/286101.html I tried to see the leaf for myself, but the pictures are too small for me to see.
     
  10. non_cents

    non_cents Well-Known Member

    Looks more like MD, but I am not well-versed in die varieties on quarters. Without the book in front of me, it certainly could be RPM-003 and I hope it is.
    Keep up the hunt!

    edited
     
  11. kelleef

    kelleef Member

    Ty non I still waiting on cmc to get back to me
     
  12. gunnovice09

    gunnovice09 Nothing

    Sorry but I had to "like" this post haha. I agree though asking for people for likes is annoying. You can have a million of them, but what do they get you, nothing.
     
  13. jello

    jello Not Expert★NormL®

    Here a photo of Rpm #3
    The second D should be East of the primary D should. Like this photo

    «®»
     

    Attached Files:

  14. non_cents

    non_cents Well-Known Member

    Jello, this one is a spread to the west. I don't think it's an RPM. The OP is pointing out the anomaly to the west, nothing seems to be present to the east. I would say mechanical doubling.

    Keep up the hunt!

    P.S. you might want to be careful with what you upload, most authors require permission from a user to post an image from a book one person paid for.
     
  15. kelleef

    kelleef Member

    I agree with you non
     
  16. jello

    jello Not Expert★NormL®

    That One don't
    &
    Don't get to two

    «®»
     
  17. jello

    jello Not Expert★NormL®

     
  18. non_cents

    non_cents Well-Known Member

     
  19. jello

    jello Not Expert★NormL®

  20. desertgem

    desertgem Senior Errer Collecktor Supporter

    That is correct, each working die. Until it was actually cut on the master.
     
  21. non_cents

    non_cents Well-Known Member

    Jello, that link says that the mintmark was hand-punched into each working die, just as I said...
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page