... I don't mind much either way as I bought it only because the toning was almost the same color as the cocktail in my hand... Hiccup :smile http://www.ebay.com/itm/1900-O-Morg...KfwGBO%2FYkLf%2FyEuak%3D&orig_cvip=true&rt=nc
Oh, it's MS all right... and damn near 65 too, if you ask me. And check it for the OMM (O/CC) when you get her in hand too, because (I can't believe I'm gonna say this) I swear I see something protruding from the top of the mintmark. :yes: Image courtesy of VAMWorld.com
It's hard for me to judge the grade particularly since the obverse photo was taken at an angle to try to capture the toning. I don't see any evidence of an OMM. All I see are the random "speckles" in the toning. Chris
This one worked out pretty nice ehh? Thanks guys and Nice Call on the grade iGradeMS70 and nice call on the NO o/cc Chris P.S. I just now noticed that my title was wrong...lol it's a 1900 o... I really must have enjoyed that cocktail
I think it looks like wear in the high spots, and I would say AU. Very nice coin, though. I agree with Chris--poor angle for the photograph.
Yep... I have to agree with ANACS, looks like MS65 to me. Makes you wonder what grade PCGS would have given it; we have at least two members here who think it's AU.
Well, I think it is AU based on the picture, that show an almost featherless breast on the eagle. Either it is a terrible picture, or the weakest strike around. I suspect the picture is awful.
