Experts please: 1936-D three and a half leg Nickel?

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by marbury518, Mar 5, 2013.

  1. silentnviolent

    silentnviolent accumulator--selling--make an offer I can't refuse

    :) tsk, tsk! it's like watching a dog repeatedly try to sniff the campfire! :pointnlaugh:

    Lesson #1: make up your mind. Error? Variety? Which is it?
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. silentnviolent

    silentnviolent accumulator--selling--make an offer I can't refuse

    Not synonymous....
     

    Attached Files:

  4. frankstony

    frankstony New Member

    Big words always make people seem smarter supercalifragilisticexpealidocious.......there.
     
  5. silentnviolent

    silentnviolent accumulator--selling--make an offer I can't refuse

    ^fail!
     

    Attached Files:

  6. xGAJx

    xGAJx Happy

  7. xGAJx

    xGAJx Happy

  8. non_cents

    non_cents Well-Known Member

    Tony,
    forgive me but I just need to ask...do you think that the back right leg is the one that defines the 3 or 3 1/2 legged Buffalo? Because the coin in the original post does show some separation in that leg...BUT that is not the leg that defines the variety.
     
  9. gunnovice09

    gunnovice09 Nothing

  10. non_cents

    non_cents Well-Known Member

    Let's not try insulting now...the point of this thread (and my main objective) is to educate. That's what posting a coin and asking for an opinion is about, right? Otherwise we are getting nowhere. (We are probably going nowhere anyway, but it was worth a shot)
     
  11. Travlntiques

    Travlntiques Well-Known Member

    With a response that gracious, your popcorn is on the house! :thumb:
     
  12. jello

    jello Not Expert★NormL®

    Expert

    1936-D
    Buffalo nickel is One Easy Die variety that Can be seen without
    a lop .
    Matt + Jack answer 2 pages back. I am Not a Expert .
    When that word is used 98% of the bad answer you will get are Wrong !
     
  13. frankstony

    frankstony New Member

    [​IMG]Simon, this pic is what has kept me in this thing. If you look at the back front leg(on the right pic) you will see that the leg is there but the ankle ,right above the hoof is smaller around, than the pic on the left. That is why I am saying that some of these 36 d's look like this.(The pic on the right)
     
  14. frankstony

    frankstony New Member

    GO to buffalonickelinfo.com and the first pic you see is a nice picture of what I am saying. 4 legs with a partial chunk out of the front back leg. You will also be able to see the fifth leg (ghost leg) behind the front outside leg.
     
  15. frankstony

    frankstony New Member

    Im done with this post, I am bowing out now.......thank you and good night.
     
  16. justafarmer

    justafarmer Senior Member

    The coin in post #23 is not what I would expect to see in an over polished die. The area where the divce has been removed appears to be on the same elevation as the fields of the coin.
     
  17. marbury518

    marbury518 Marbury

    Well my coin feels very important after causing such controvery and ill will. Not that I had any offers, even low ballers.
     
  18. frankstony

    frankstony New Member

    Thats because the coin in post 23 is a 3 leg not a 3 and 1/2.
     
  19. marbury518

    marbury518 Marbury

    Yes, that was somewhat distracting from the point. I think you are outnumbered frankstony but a good fight it was. Looks like it will be consigned to the change jar then.
     
  20. justafarmer

    justafarmer Senior Member

    The number of legs is not the issue. And of course I do not have the coin in hand. But what I see in that image is not what I would expect to see from an overpolished die.
     
  21. desertgem

    desertgem Senior Errer Collecktor Supporter

    And that is well and good because such are not allowed outside of the advertisement section and would attract unwanted attention to both sides :)
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page