I posted some low value coins on CT and one member pointed out that this was the three and a half leg variety of 1936-D Nickel. If it is, then clearly an excellent find. If others confirm this, it will have to go off to NGC.
maybe bad pictures, but I see a shaded leg, above E in CENTS, but im wondering why the first leg isn't disapearing, can you tell my why its not a 3 1/2 variety Lost Dutchman?
Seriously? Some of us know and understand that you are very young, but not everyone will. Now what you need to understand is that acting like you know what you're talking about while spouting nonsense helps no one, including you. Read more, post less. As for the coin in question, I agree with the others; no.
Can't get any more obvious that it is not a 3 1/2 legged Buffalo if it has more than 3 1/2 legs. :yes:
A 36 D has 4 legs. The half comes into play with the knee of the front back leg, and the leg that you can plainly see behind the front leg.i .
Take a look again, Tony...the coin in the OP has the full leg. The one you posted appears to have 1/2 the leg missing.
In my opinion it seems to be just a dirty coin, sorry! Keep up the.... Continue searching for coins. (Scared non_cents might have patented that... :too-funny
Why is everyone ignoring the fifth leg.( the ghost leg behind the front outside leg above the E. xGAJx sees it also. That is why I posted the picture I posted, not to show the inside leg, but the outside ghost leg.The OPs coin has this.
I think everyone isn't paying attention to the "fifth leg" because the original question was about 3 1/2 legs, not 5.:rollling:
None...what you are seeing is part of the design. It can be seen behind the front left leg of the Buffalo in this picture as well. http://0.tqn.com/d/coins/1/0/y/E/-/-/US0005-Buffalo-Nickels-F12-NGC-1.jpg