To me the 1 looks to have some minor repunching going on but I can't match it to one of the several in Rick Snow's book. The 1 looks a bit fat in some areas and that makes me think repunched. I don't know for sure. These varieties can drive you crazy.
I don't see it. I would have to say no. I don't see it. I would have to say no. Are you using a 10x loupe? Michael
Yes, I am using a 10x loupe. Do you think it could be triple punched? I don't have any other 1898's to compare it to, but I do have a 1895. I don't know if the 8's and 9's are different on purpose or because the '98 is repunched. Here are pics.
I see what you are talking about... let me cross check I have an extensive Indian head collection. I now see what you're talking about. I have plenty of reference books too. Give me a day or two and I'll get back with you. Michael