Yeah, looking at it now, I can see that. BUT, it's ok. I need one (counterfeit) for my collection. This will educate my brother and myself. It's only a $160 'mistake' if it is counterfeit. :| However, the coin is in VA and I am in CA. I'll be able to take a look at it in a few weeks. Oh well. Live and learn, right?
The coin has raised spots on the surface, which are indicative of a counterfeit. Vroomer, 160 is still an okay deal, since the coin is more than likely gold, and within tolerances. It looks like your probaly only paid 20 dollars over spot, but it's a very nice counterfeit.
Another thing that to me condemns the coin is the tooling on the obverse at 9 oclock extending from the rim into the field.
I had told my bro to see what the mass of the coin was and get a picture for me BEFORE he bought it. Regardless, I will be submitting this for a grade. He claims his camera takes bad pictures.
It all comes in time, looking at a lot of coins and reading a lot of books on that subject. If it help most of us did not see it either. Good eye Zaneman.
yeah, since I collect much cheaper coin on the whole (save the odd pricey one here and there) I buy with much more confidence but I also know what to look for with a cast fake. I worry far more when I buy an ancient or any older more valuable coin. though most people wont take the time to fake a circulated modern nickel / copper / alum / silver / etc...
Zane, can you point out some of the raised spots on the surface and also the tooling that you're talking about? I'm just not seeing them...
Although I dont see the raised spots he sees, I do see some issues with the denticles on the reverse. 4:00 and 8:00 area in particular. Is that enough for me to say its a counterfeit, no, am I bit suspect of the coin, yes. I vote you weigh it. If thats ok, submit to NGC, PCGS or ANACS for authenication purposes.