Interesting toning.

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Detecto92, Dec 31, 2012.

  1. Detecto92

    Detecto92 Well-Known Member

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    I think it is attractive.

    [​IMG]
     
  4. Detecto92

    Detecto92 Well-Known Member

    Me too. What kind of condition would cause this? I've seen a lot of bullseye toning, but never neon blue almost all the way around.
     
  5. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    The untoned areas at 2 & 3 o'clock make me think EOR toning, but that is a pure guess. I also think this is a secondary toning and that the coin was lightly cleaned or dipped prior to being toned. It is a cool looking coin.
     
  6. Cazkaboom

    Cazkaboom One for all, all for me.

    I am definitely a fan of the blues, especially the darker blue on her headdress, but I don't like how much the non-blue toning masks the luster.
     
  7. cpm9ball

    cpm9ball CANNOT RE-MEMBER

    I'm not a big fan of the layout of the color, and I don't see how PCGS could give it a 62. It looks like a slider to me.

    Chris
     
  8. BUncirculated

    BUncirculated Well-Known Member

    Beautiful coin. Drool factor 5.
     
  9. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    I dunno, that coin makes me suspicious. It just looks like it's been worked on to me.
     
  10. rodeoclown

    rodeoclown Dodging Bulls

    That's the first thing I was thinking as well. It's like it got toned but then went out for some circulation time before heading to the slabbery.
     
  11. petro89

    petro89 Member

    Ooo I love blue Morgans. Shane has a few on ebay from time to time a few of which Morgandude outbid me on :) There are some similar ones out there for sure. I have one...but one probably isn't enough :)
     
  12. cpm9ball

    cpm9ball CANNOT RE-MEMBER

    I got this one from Shane a couple years ago. He sent me photos of three new acquisitions which were headed for eBay, this being one of them. I called Shane immediately and made him an offer for all three which he accepted. I don't want to tell you what it cost because I'd hate to see a grown man cry.

    Chris
     

    Attached Files:

  13. raider34

    raider34 Active Member

    EOR was my first thought too. To me it looks like the obverse was thumbed (in the holder/roll) prior to the toning. If someone had rubbed/handled the coin in that fashion it would explain why the high-points of the device and the center of the fields didn't tone like the rest of the obv. Also, it explains why the toning continued in the recessed sections of the obverse device, because those sections wouldn't have been reached by light handling/rubbing. That mark at the base of Liberty's neck also looks like a small section of fingerprint.

    Interesting coin, Detecto are you going to be bidding on it?
     
  14. HowardStern

    HowardStern Member

    Its all the way around the coin. Like someone Q tipped with some chemical.
    I dont trust any strongly toned coins. Not even the slabbed ones.
     
  15. Danr

    Danr Numismatist

    it is NT- look at the field/device contrast
     
  16. Kirkuleez

    Kirkuleez 80 proof

    To me, it looks like it was very harshly cleaned on the obverse. Why else would the toning be in the recesses of the coin and not all over? Also, it really looks lifeless and dull on the obverse. It's a shame really, that would have been a beautiful blue coin.
     
  17. theSharpGun

    theSharpGun The King

    The seller had this coin on BIN for $220 a few weeks ago. It didn't sell on a BIN so he decided to sell it through an auction. I guess many buyers were either scared or turned off by the toning since it looks a bit fishy. JMO.
     
  18. coleguy

    coleguy Coin Collector

    The color is nice, but there are other things I don't like.
     
  19. petro89

    petro89 Member

    I do like how the toning is in between the recessed areas kinda like lava.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page