Kennedy Half clashed die - your thoughts?

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by gbroke, Oct 2, 2012.

  1. gbroke

    gbroke Naturally Toned

    Heya Folks,

    Yesterday I found this (what I now know to be a die clash) Kennedy half dollar in a roll from the bank.
    I am not a roll-searcher, but the tellers do tell me when people bring in rolls of halves or Ikes.

    Anyway, I was just blasting through them looking for silver. When I saw this one, the marks were noticeable by quick glance.
    I have never seen a die clash in hand, nor do I collect errors.

    I did do a little research on the interwebs, and now I have a couple questions.

    Are die clashes like this fairly common?
    Are die clashes consider "varieties", or errors?
    Is there any added value to this particular half dollar because of the clash?

    I don't think I need to point out the clash marks on the obverse. I haven't had a chance yet to look more closely at the reverse.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    Here is an overlay of a Kennedy that finally made me realize what it was.
    [​IMG]

    Thanks for any input,

    -greg
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. jello

    jello Not Expert★NormL®

    1982-P KD half there a few things worn dies strike thru or a clashed.die this one for an Expert.Wexler-Potter. or Mike D
     
  4. valente151

    valente151 Mr. AU64, Jr.

    Very cool. No idea on value though.
     
  5. atrox001

    atrox001 Senior Member

  6. gbroke

    gbroke Naturally Toned

    Thanks Larry.
    I did find that site and learned a thing or two. It doesn't mention anything about how rare they or how much of a clash would get a premium if any. I did see they had a few 1983 die clashes for the half dollar.

    -greg
     
  7. rascal

    rascal Well-Known Member

    this looks as if it has been a really strong die clash and some of the clash marks has probably been removed by the mint workers.
    I can see what looks like polishing marks above Kennedy's nose and on the back of the neck. It's still is a nice find .
     
  8. bobbeth87

    bobbeth87 Coin Collector

  9. cpm9ball

    cpm9ball CANNOT RE-MEMBER

    Great find, Greg!

    I have an 82-P with the clash also, and I'm wondering if mine is a later die state (LDS) of yours. Mine has been heavily abraded to remove some of the clash, and the only part of it remaining are the rays below the neck. The rays under the chin are gone and it has the "Partial FG" on the reverse with the addition of a "Plugged Tail" which looks to be from a large die break.

    Chris
     

    Attached Files:

  10. Jim M

    Jim M Ride it like ya stole it

    Greg.. sit tight. I know of a person that can probably help you on this. PM coming.
     
  11. lassiejames

    lassiejames New Member

    that's really awesome !! you've GOT t0 tell me how to do that overlay please...and thanks.
     
  12. Conder101

    Conder101 Numismatist

    Clashes are fairly common and usually do not bring a premium. They aren't really an error, but they aren't really a variety either. They aren't an error because they appear on all the coins struck by that die until the clashmarks are either polished off or wear off. (Most pieces considered errors are striking errors and are unique for each coin.) They aren a variety because although they are reproduced on every coin struck by the die, they don't appear on coins struck by the die before it clashed, or after the clashmarks are removed. What they really are are a die stage in the life of that die. And a clashmark can not be used to identify a particular die because another die can clash and have identical or near identical clashmarks.
     
  13. gbroke

    gbroke Naturally Toned

    Thanks for the information everyone. At the very least I learned something new. Now I will keep my out for these in the future. I didn't expect it would be worth much, but I do find it very interesting.

    Oh wow Chris. What a difference in the details in the tail feathers.
    So was heavy die polishing the reason there are "no FG" Kennedy's ?

    Grabbed some U.S. mint images, rotated the reverse 180 degrees, lined them up and gave the reverse some transparency. Easy cheesy.
     
  14. gbroke

    gbroke Naturally Toned

    That makes perfect sense Conder. Thanks for the information.
     
  15. cpm9ball

    cpm9ball CANNOT RE-MEMBER

    Correct! It takes some other marker to determine if any two clashes came from the same die.

    An example would be the 228 - 1980 Lincoln cents I found with a clashed "Y" from LIBERTY while searching a $50 Mint bag. All of the coins had the identical die scratches on the obverse which linked them to the clashed reverse.

    Naturally, it would be just a shot in the dark if Greg and I were able to find some common marker which linked our two coins together as possibly two die states. No, they wouldn't have any great value, but they are still kind of cool.

    Chris
     
  16. cpm9ball

    cpm9ball CANNOT RE-MEMBER

    Yes, in both cases, the 72-P and 82-P with the "No FG" were the result of die abrasion probably due to the Mint's attempts to remove the clashes.

    Chris
     
  17. atrox001

    atrox001 Senior Member

    Here is an idea what a clashed half dollar might be worth...I sold this one on EBay.

    It was a 68D Major Obverse and Reverse Clash for $53.

    Larry Nienaber
     
  18. Ethan

    Ethan Collector of Kennedy's

Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page