Scanning a Coin ... not as good, but good enough?

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by Kim94595, Sep 26, 2012.

  1. Kim94595

    Kim94595 New Member

    Hi all. I'm new here and just trying to learn a bit from all of you. I'm wondering if a high resolution scan is sufficient for most purposes? Are many of the coins on Ebay scanned as opposed to photgraphed? It is indeed, a lot quicker! I'm practising both methods on a junk coin to see what I can manage. This one is scanned. Any opinions? Thanks!
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Taxidermist

    Taxidermist Collector of US/IL/RU/DE

    Looks like it is made from alabaster, quite horrible.

    Scanned coins usually show no luster and often give wrong impression. You will do much better using an inexpensive camera and, very important, proper lighting.

    Try experimenting with coins that show some luster to see if they look nice photographed, not with junk coins, which might look bad using both methods.
     
  4. dwhiz

    dwhiz Collector Supporter

    1944 PCGS MS64 CAC Old Holder-horz.jpg 1877 S PCGS XF45-horz.jpg I think part of the problem is your coin...looks cleaned heres a couple of my scans. It's a Epson V330. I do perfer my Canon camera. I use the scanner only for a quick referance.
     
  5. buddy16cat

    buddy16cat Well-Known Member

    I can see the luster of the Mercury dime in that scan. I use the scanner because it is faster. Has anyone tried using their web cam as well? I think I may try this to see how it will work out.
     
  6. Tom B

    Tom B TomB Everywhere Else

    A scan can be quite adequate to show off details, but they generally do not show color or luster very well. Just a decade ago, or even less, scans of coins were far more common than today and most folks could interpret the scanned images very well. Over time and with the addition of many newer collectors, that general ability to interpret scanned images appears to have diminished.
     
  7. Leadfoot

    Leadfoot there is no spoon

    As a buyer of coins, I prefer a photograph over a scan.

    A scan is easier to do and can easily outdo a poor photograph, but even the best scan provides comparatively less color and luster information than a well-taken photograph. And evaluating color and luster is very important to someone trying to evaluate a coin as part of an online purchase. So for that reason, to me a good photograph wins hands down.

    That said, the gap between photographs and scans is the narrowest with well circulated coinage that has a thick (and often lusterless) skin.
     
  8. Sure would like to see nice hi res images of that Trade!
     
  9. Kim94595

    Kim94595 New Member

    Thank You all ...

    I do appreciate the critique and the helpful advice. I'll work more on photographing. Like I said, I'm just new here and trying to learn. Baby steps. Thanks for being cool about it.
     
  10. cciesielski01

    cciesielski01 Laced Up

    I scan alot of my images on a cheapo cannon printer scanner duo. I only use it for lower grade coins I photograph all my higher end stuff.
     
  11. McBlzr

    McBlzr Sr Professional Collector

  12. Kim94595

    Kim94595 New Member

    That's more than cool of you to do that for me! Very, very helpful info. and you didn't have to do that for any other reason ... except that you just wanted to help. Really very nice. I'm thinking that "coin guys" are all right!
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page