Test your Grading Skills!

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by chop45, Aug 11, 2006.

  1. chop45

    chop45 New Member

    Uncertified 1897 Morgan. Any ideas on a grade would be greatly appreciated. :hail:


    [​IMG]

    I personally give it an AU-55.
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Leadfoot

    Leadfoot there is no spoon

    MS 63 is my guess...Mike
     
  4. B12

    B12 Coin Hoarder

    I agree Chop45,AU55.
     
  5. Bonedigger

    Bonedigger New Member

    Gotta go with a 55 or 58.

    Bone
     
  6. sf340flier

    sf340flier New Member

    Solid 55, imo.
     
  7. bzcollektor

    bzcollektor SSDC Life Member

    Could be a weak strike MS61. I base the weak strike on the apparent (but not necessarily) wear on the hair over the ear on the obverse, and the lack of definition of the breast feathers on the reverse. Alot of O mint Morgans have this weak strike. The P mint are usually fully struck, but there are exceptions. The scuffing on the cheek and in the fields look consistant with an MS61.
    This is almost an unfair grading challange. I think you really are asking if we think this is an AU55-58 coin, or some sort of low MS coin. I would have to see it in hand. It could be anything from AU53- MS61. Absolutly not less than an AU53-55, but absolutly no higher than MS61, even on a very good day.
     
  8. chop45

    chop45 New Member

    As always thanks for your input guys.:thumb:
     
  9. YNcoinpro_U.S.

    YNcoinpro_U.S. New Member

    I'll give it a 58.
     
  10. zaneman

    zaneman Former Moderator

    That coin was cleaned and altered IMO. It would grade a 53 or 55.
     
  11. chop45

    chop45 New Member

    "That coin was cleaned and altered IMO"
    I'd have to completely disagree with you. Im just curious how you reached that conclusion.
     
  12. b.j.

    b.j. Senior Member

    I would give it an AU-55 also. There appears to be slight wear on the obverse and the eagle's breast on the reverse shows slight wear. I would need to have it in hand to see if this is wear or a weak strike. If its a week strike, I would say and MS-61.
     
  13. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    I would say the wear warrants no better than XF45 - this date & mint is not known for weak strikes and there is no luster in the flat areas. I do think however that the coin has been over-dipped due to the lack of remaining luster in the fields that shoulld be there for a coin with this amount of wear.
     
  14. chop45

    chop45 New Member

    Today when I was at the my local coin dealer and had them take a look at it and they called it an AU-55. I think the picture was a little to misleading. I can call a clean/dipped coin when I see one, and I know for a fact that isnt one.
     
  15. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    Fair enough Chop, but hopefully you also realize that approximately 80% - 90% of all older US silver coins in existence have been dipped - that includes Morgans.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page