Realized with all my Morgans, I didn't have a nice 1882s.....

With all of my Morgans, I realized that one of the dates I was missing was the 1882s, which is an easy date to find a pretty coin. I have so many, I often forget what I have and what I don't. So, went shopping and came up with this OGH one--looks pretty nice for the grade and almost PL. It is on its way here.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

I am not a Morgan expert, but I play one online. This one looks pretty darn clean for a 64! Resubmit? If not a 65, maybe a 64+.

 

I like :hail:

 

Very nice Morgan!

 

Nice Morgan. Sometimes you just happen to be missing a common year coin for your set.

 

It does look pretty clean.

"I don't always grade Morgans, but when I do, I'm usually wrong"

 

Very nice Morgan , but from the pics I can't tell if it's proof like . But hope it is . :thumb:

 

Thanks folks. I thought it looked very clean--it was in a dealer friend's newsletter, and was the best one he had. Is it PL? Most likely not, but it would likely upgrade to a 65 if I had wanted to go that route. I'd rather have it in an OGH as a 64, as the price difference isn't spectacular, and I have 1878s, 1879s, 1880s, 1881s, and 1882s now in OGHs. I like subsets within Morgans--also have 1880cc, 1881cc, 1882cc, 1883cc, 1884cc, 1885cc in GSAs. So, why break up two nice sub groups?