Grading Troubles

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by mrbrklyn, Jul 31, 2012.

  1. mrbrklyn

    mrbrklyn New Member

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Hunt1

    Hunt1 Active Member

    I think the second link is accurate, i guess it depends on how strict you are, first one is overgraded though imo.
     
  4. mrbrklyn

    mrbrklyn New Member

    How can it be a 65 with that many contact marks on the face?
     
  5. Hunt1

    Hunt1 Active Member

    Never said it was a 65 Ruben, But I agree with you, sadly PCGS views it otherwise.
     
  6. mrbrklyn

    mrbrklyn New Member

    [​IMG]

    this is being graded as a 65? With all these marks? Her throat is slit.
     
  7. mrbrklyn

    mrbrklyn New Member

    Sorry, you agree with the first :)

    My appologies. Although I can't see the the second one should be a 64. A 64 should be problem free with no more than 3 -5 bag marks....hardly a definition that can be applied to the second example.
     
  8. Hunt1

    Hunt1 Active Member

    No no no Ruben, those are wrinkles! If you were 131 years old, you would have some too!
     
  9. mrbrklyn

    mrbrklyn New Member

    I see my mrbrklyn persona is not working anymore :) I
    m flattered that everyone in this bar knows me.
     
  10. Hunt1

    Hunt1 Active Member

    Who is mrbrklyn?
     
  11. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    Not according to PCGS;
    I have seen 67's with 3-5 bag marks (all-be-it tiny baggies).
     
  12. mrbrklyn

    mrbrklyn New Member

    Then they suck. Its also not consistent with what I generally see.
     
  13. mrbrklyn

    mrbrklyn New Member

    Red Book

    IMO - they both qualify for this definition
     
  14. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    Have to agree they are both over-graded.
     
  15. BUncirculated

    BUncirculated Well-Known Member

    Possibly the PCGS graded Morgan may have been slid up one grade because it's a Carson City strike, and a GSA Morgan.

    The NGC graded Morgan, at least 2 points higher than it deserves.
     
  16. Leadfoot

    Leadfoot there is no spoon

    Or, perhaps, you're not as good of a grader as you think you are -- and you're using a photo.
     
  17. Leadfoot

    Leadfoot there is no spoon

    p.s. the first coin in question seems to me to be an example of the CC grade bump -- but remember we're looking at a crappy Heritage photo.
     
  18. LindeDad

    LindeDad His Walker.

    Anybody else seeing the bid 64 ​that I am?
     
  19. mrbrklyn

    mrbrklyn New Member

    I have no doubt in my mind about that. It is an easy 63. How can they miss by two grades.

    BTW - in case you wanted to know, ICG will have a table at the Phili show with deals on grading.
     
  20. mrbrklyn

    mrbrklyn New Member

    We have the following service.

    For standard grading it will cost yah $39.95

    For serious grading, $62.95

    For accurate grade, call for pricing.
     
  21. BUncirculated

    BUncirculated Well-Known Member

    That's the point to what I stated Ruben. They slid the grade up on that two points because of what the coin is.

    A Carson City Morgan, and a GSA Hoard Morgan.

    I'm willing to bet if that dollar was not a GSA coin, it wouldn't have been over-graded like it was, it would have had to hold it's own as a CC Morgan.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page