Is this not full banded and missed by NGC? http://www.ebay.com/itm/C-USA-1926-...62?pt=Coins_US_Individual&hash=item51a01d9972
It may be too weak for them to attribute it. I know angst is really strict when it comes to the full struck designations
I don't collect these things, so what is the criteria for FB? I ask because I noted the mark (?) on the middle-left of the top bands. Chris
For NGC, all 3 bands have to be clear, distinct and unbroken. For PCGS, only the middle band has to be clear, distinct, and unbroken.
I am not sure but if you just marked Grade on form+Did Not mark the detail box and pay that fee too FB maybe a paid for detail.they change stuff so much. Or Chris its right the band is weak or grader were extra tough that day but still a nice Mercury Dime!
Good question. Of course you'd have to ask the same question about any special designation on any coin since NGC is tougher than PCGS on all of them. You can find the answer easy enough by checking completed sales on Heritage.
I wouldn't say NGC slabbed coins command a premium over PCGS, but I have seen an increase in popularity around my neck of the woods for PCGS slabbed and designated coins because their standards for designations is easier and more relaxed than NGC. As Doug mentioned, PCGS looks only at the middle bands on the Merc series, wherein NGC looks at all three. The same is true of the Franklin series when assessing for the FBL, PCGS looks at the bottom set of lines, while NGC assess both sets of lines.
Like Lincolns are designated red, red/brown or brown. Free! But the D over S or whatever is attributed. Cost money!
Yeah, but I'm showing to a FB designation from NGC which has the same middle top band break as the first example.
I was actually referring that the tougher grader(by standards) is sometimes considered (if not preferred) an underdog. So it wasn't quite a question.