Ok the other day at Subway, these two coins, among others, were included with my change... I can't even tell the year on the "S" wheat penny, but not sure if that's because it's just been badly damaged through circulation, or something else has caused the damage? As to the 2003 "D" dime, can someone tell me if dimes normally turn this color through circulation, or am I missing something? Thanks and I appreciate any feedback.
These both look like "parking lot finds". I believe the dime's appearance is due to long time exposure to the elements (rain, sun, etc.). I believe they are both PMD. Too bad, too because the wheatie reverse indicates the coin was in pretty good shape before someone ran over it several times But then again, this is just my opinion. Wait to see what others say for sure!
Well thank you, I appreciate the info, especially since I'm just learning about coins. But I do have another question for you... Can you even make out what the year is on the "wheat" penny? Also, let's just say the penny was not damaged and we knew what date it was (it looks like 19*4 -- can't really make out the 3rd number), what would the value have been, given the "S" looks, and please correct me if I'm wrong, like its "double struck"??? Thanks.
Not even. Most circulation finds from the mid 30s to late 50s wheaties are only worth it's bulk wheatie price (3-5 cents)...though a 36S might be able to be sold for a bit more.
If you look at the top rounded part of the "S" that's where it appears to be doubled... I thought the picture was a pretty good view, but I did take it with my phone... I'll try and see if I can get a better pic, although, would it make a difference, given how badly it is damaged?
Can't be a 56 because it has an S mintmark and San Francisco closed in 55. Can't be a 36-S because the 3 didn't curve down like that in 36. the last digit looks more like a 4 to me (the odd tipped angle of the picture doesn't help) so i would say it is a 54-S
