1972P doubled die obverse 002

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by Chetjones, Jun 1, 2012.

  1. Chetjones

    Chetjones New Member

    Hey guys,

    It's been awhile since I've been able to check in, hope everyone is well. Last night I came across what seems to be the 72p ddo-002. I compared it to the varieties on coppercoins.com and it matches all the pictures for the 004. I'll try to get some decent pics uploaded in just a few mins and see what you guys think, also maybe a ballpark value of what the coin could be worth. I'll be returning shortly with some pics for you all to check out.
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Chetjones

    Chetjones New Member

    Here are a few pics. Sorry about the bad lighting
     

    Attached Files:

  4. Chetjones

    Chetjones New Member

    few more
     

    Attached Files:

  5. WriterIN

    WriterIN New Member

    Looks good, Chet. I particularly like the "fluted" tail on the 2. The "In God We Trust" has that shelving look typical of machine doubling, but the "Liberty" is positively howling "I'm a DD"!
     
  6. desertgem

    desertgem Senior Errer Collecktor

    I believe it is the -002. The other possibility may be the -007, but looking at the upper tip of the 2 should help you decide. The 002 has a distinct notch from the doubling and the 7 is more rounded. Your photo is a little difficult to distinguish.

    A doubled die can also be MDD as the true doubling occurs as the working die is being hubbed ( pressed by a reverse image die at least 2 times with heating to soften in between). The working die ( which will strike the coin) is removed from the setup during heating/cooling, and if not realigned perfectly, the working die will have a double image. So a true doubled working die can strike a coin ( producing the DD) and then move as it comes off of the struck coin producing MDD. Not usual, but I have seen it.

    If you look at the bottom of the "G" and "O" in GOD, you can see that the 2 images tends to merge with just a thin line separating due to the natural rounding of the letters. This shows that both images were about the same depth, indicating a true doubling and not MD. IMO.

    Jim
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page