The 1921 Morgan is quite common but this one is cooler than what I usually see. What do you think it graded at PCGS?
A few minor dings and a bit of scribble on the reverse i think are just enough to keep it out of gem.. So will call it MS64 Absolutely beautiful 21 Love the toning
I am going with 63. The luster is a little dull and I see random circ. hairlines on the cheek and jaw. It is perty for a 21. These usually have a mottled toning to them.
64. Beautiful color. Nice luster. A bit too much chatter for gem, but a very attractive coin. I would happily own it. I don’t see any wear, so it isn’t high AU. Lowest it could possibly be is 63. 1921 Morgans rarely tone that nicely.
Yikes..late but I was thinking 64. Looking closely I wonder if a bit of rub (disturbed luster on the cheek?) makes it a slider...the grade is a compromise. Perhaps.
That is certainly possible. It is still an odd way to do it. In most cases a 61 is worse than a 58 (especially on something like this common 1921 Morgan).
They clearly net graded it, because of the dings. I disagree with their grade, as either it has very minor rub from circulation, or it is a MS coin. A 61 grade is definitely a hedge on PCGS’ part.
I would definitely rather have a 58+....luckily I was not the one that sent this in but bought the coin already slabbed. I disagree with it too. I could see the case if it was a technical grade on a blast white coin. If they are market grading (which we are often told they are), I'd expect a 58, 58+, or 63 (maybe 62 if they want to be picky).