You vs PCGS: What is the grade?

My going plain MS-65 no FBL designation.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

Maybe I'm crazy, since so many people here like that coin, but: to me it looks like an "ugly" coin, with some very odd, "splotchy" toning. Someone else here said "is seriously missing luster"--So much so that I'd say, "Altered Surfaces", & should be in a "Genuine", or "Details" holder.

Plus, it's such a common date, so.......why?

 

I'm going plain MS-65 no FBL designation.

 

I wouldn't crack it, unless you just want it on the holder. I wouldn't call it it FBL based on the pictures, but I also had two FBL PCGS coins submitted to CAC and they both came back with CAC stickers. This has led me to believe that I might be too hard on the FBL designation...

 

Behold the power of Microsoft Paint!

Nice coin, BTW. The toning is a bit unusual but not unattractive.

A keeper.

 

LOL, OK Doug


MS66 FBL

 

Touche'... It would help if I looked at the very BOTTOM line wouldn't it..

Guess I will not resubmit the coin. I will leave it as is edited ...:devil:

 

Sorry, i meant AU details :devil:

 

Tough to say going from your photos....

Do you have better photos of the bell line?

They typically are better shown by lighting the coin from 6 o'clock.

Perhaps you might take another picture and post it.

THanks...Mike.

p.s. lol @ AU comments on a coin that almost certainly spent its life and toned in a mint set.