What exactly is a counterfeit coin?

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by medoraman, Apr 12, 2012.

  1. medoraman

    medoraman Supporter! Supporter

    But these are laws to prosecute people with. Therefor, it has to be describing the ACT that could be PUNISHABLE. Big difference between that and what I am asking about.

    I guess I am not trying to ask what legal case we could build, but what others classify coins as. Personally I am with Hontania. I recognize various types of coins;

    1. Original
    2. Contemporary counterfeits, (made at the time to be spent, collectible today)
    3. Artistic reproductions, (Paduan replicas, the mint in AR that used to strike coins)
    4. Counterfeits. Everything else, made to fool collectors.

    This is simply the definitions I, and many others, use. I just wanted to talk about it and see if I was simply losing it, since in some discussions this definition seems to have been foreign to many.

    Now, if someone wishes to argue that something is an artistic reproduction versus counterfeit, then I am open to that. It was simply the definitions that people were throwing around of what constitutes a counterfeit coin. If people disagree with this classification I would love to hear about it.

    Chris

    Btw, I am not ruling out the idea that someone could immune from the verb counterfeiting, and still be creating a counterfeit coin. They could be two different things.
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. onecoinpony

    onecoinpony Member

    With all the legal cites being offered throughout this forum, please remember not to place too much weight on them. The cases really need to be shepardized.
     
  4. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    Chris it's no different than with the definitions of any word. People always have "their version" of what a word means. And often "their version" has little to nothing to do with the actual definition of the word. THAT is the problem.

    People have forgotten that there are very specific, established, and accepted definitions for every word in the English language. And depending on the context the word is used in, then that word will often have a completely different and specialized definition. And in numismatics, that happens a lot. But even then it is an established and accepted definition.

    I dunno, I guess I'm weird. By the time was in the 4th grade I had the reading level of a college graduate. Vocabulary was never an issue for me. I always knew what the definitions were and used the words correctly, always have. Been a habit my entire life, couldn't change it if I wanted to. Nor can I change my reaction to people incorrectly using words, or assigning invalid definitions. Like I said I guess I'm weird. I'm stuck on what the books say.

    That doesn't mean that I don't understand people's points of view on how they use words, or even their personal versions of definitions. I do understand them, but that doesn't make it right.
     
  5. SteveCaruso

    SteveCaruso Counterfeit Collector

    A counterfeit is merely anything made with the criminal intent to defraud, otherwise it's simply an art piece (which covers reproductions, fantasy pieces, etc.). This does mean that a counterfeit's legality can come into question as many times as it changes hands depending solely upon the moral fiber of its most current bearer.

    That said, the only people who are responsible for marking their products with "COPY" under the Hobby Protection Act are either 1) manufacturers of numismatic replicas living in the US for the distribution or introduction into commerce or 2) importers of numismatic replicas into the US for the distribution or introduction into commerce.

    If you buy a coin press and start punching out reproductions of pennies in aluminum and distribute them in an effort to raise awareness about alternate metals for currency but fail to mark them "COPY" you're in trouble. (In that scenario, you're a manufacturer.)

    If you purchase some unmarked replicas from China and sell them as reproductions (with full disclosure) without stamping them, you're in trouble (*cough!* eBay!). (In that scenario, you're an importer.)

    On the other hand, if you come across a counterfeit "in the wild" you are not legally compelled to mark them with anything (although, I'm not arguing against it being a good idea) and they are perfectly legal to own. (You're neither the manufacturer, or the importer.)

    The only thing that is compulsory for a collector under the law is being honest about what you're offering for sale or barter, otherwise you commit fraud.
     
  6. swish513

    swish513 Penny & Cent Collector

    to me, a counterfeit is intended to fraud in commerce. everything else, whether marked "copy" or has a date that never existed, is a fake.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page