1852 3-cent

Discussion in 'What's it Worth' started by scottyb, Jul 2, 2006.

  1. scottyb

    scottyb Member

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. B12

    B12 Coin Hoarder

    I can tell you one thing....it is definitely cleaned.
     
  4. scottyb

    scottyb Member

  5. bruce 1947

    bruce 1947 Support Or Troops

    HI Scott
    And welcome to to the forum ,I did not see the pcgs holder how do you no it is graded by them ?
     
  6. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator


    He doesn't - he is asking what we think PCGS would grade them.

    But to answer your question scottyb, I would not buy the first coin at all. As to the second, I would not buy it either unless it was already graded and authenticated by NGC, PCGS or ICG.
     
  7. bruce 1947

    bruce 1947 Support Or Troops

    Well I apologize for being so stupid, next time I will read more carefully before I post a reply.
     
  8. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    Not being stupid in the least - it was quite easy to misread that because of the way it was worded. I had to read it a couple of times myself.
     
  9. bruce 1947

    bruce 1947 Support Or Troops

    Thanks Doug, but I do that alot never taking the time to read befor I post.
     
  10. The_Cave_Troll

    The_Cave_Troll The Coin Troll


    What worries me the most is that the obverse photo has oviously been photoshopped to lighten the image. WHY?! the 2 pics are taken against the same color background, but the obverse was lightened, what are they hiding? I agree, stay away. It may be a nice coin (the reverse toning looks ok) but I'm seeing red flags on that one.
     
  11. Doug21

    Doug21 Coin Hoarder

    The 1852 doesn't look too bad. It may be cleaned, but long ago. Reverse looks like it's naturally toned.

    The other one looks better, but I'd want it graded first, too expensive not to.
     
  12. erwizard

    erwizard Numismatic RN

    I think the 1st one is OK, enough to give it an AU grade. The diamond on reverse is detailed, little wear on Roman numerals. As for the front I have no idea why they brightened it. It appears to have some toning to UNI on obverse. I do that from time to time though with photoshop to achieve the best pic for you guys. Sometimes a regular pic doesn't do the coin justice so we play with the contrast to "bring out" things otherwise not seen. BUT as Cave Troll said they could be hiding something. Mintage was over 18,600,000 so I wouldn't go any higher than 20 bucks. And of course I would not spend $600 on a coin, on Ebay, NOT in a holder graded by NGC, PCGS, ANACS or IGC!!!!!
     
  13. scottyb

    scottyb Member

    Thanks for all the help.

    Scott:)
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page