OK... we have a couple of "genuine" and a couple of "copy" opinions... all by respected members of this forum. I'm interested in how this pans out, as I personally have no clue.
I suppose you are seeing casting bubbles. But in this case, the "bubbles" are very fine and evenly distributed, which is characteristic of surface porosity. What's confusing on this one is the harsh cleaning.
Yes, that is what I based my opinion on. I will admit that I could be mistaken because I am not familiar with what the genuine coin should look like (and I always say knowing what the genuine coin looks like is an important part of authentication).
The thing in the photo that looks most odd is the silver color on what should be a bronze coin. There also is a lump on the reverse that looks like a broken off button shank. It could be a real coin that has suffered a lot but I'd tend to side with the fake option unless the problems are mostly from the photo and the coin looks different in hand.
I'm seeing the lump on the reverse as solder. Note the darker area on the reverse, where the soldered-on bar would block any cleaning.
The scratch may not be so good. Why not do a nondestructive test instead (e.g., a specific gravity test)?
Are you asking me? A specific gravity test would let you know the piece was not the proper SG if it was silver plated.
I just want to know why hobo took the picture of the coin in question as his own forum picture? :thumb: