post damage or grease?

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by Jim M, Jul 2, 2006.

  1. Jim M

    Jim M Ride it like ya stole it

    Here is a 68D Lincoln. (Finally going through the error box of that collection I picked up)
     

    Attached Files:

    • 68.jpg
      68.jpg
      File size:
      34.8 KB
      Views:
      186
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. jackeen

    jackeen Senior Member

    What's the obverse look like?
     
  4. B12

    B12 Coin Hoarder

    I think grease but I'm not for sure.
     
  5. xeno108

    xeno108 New Member

    i vote grease
     
  6. LSM

    LSM Collector

    My Minting Varieties and erros guide show just about the same cent with the following discription: The cent may have been struck on a improperly annealed planchet. A coin struck on a hard planchet will have poor metal flow into the design. Cause may be due to equipment failur or operator error.
     
  7. Jim M

    Jim M Ride it like ya stole it

    Obv Picture

    Thanks for the replys !


    Isnt this forum the greatest.
     

    Attached Files:

    • 68r.jpg
      68r.jpg
      File size:
      36.6 KB
      Views:
      171
  8. jackeen

    jackeen Senior Member

    As the obverse is normal, I don't think annealing problems are the cause for the odd reverse. One would expect both sides to be impacted if the metal is too hard for effective minting.
     
  9. mikediamond

    mikediamond Coin Collector

    The reverse was struck through "grease". This term is actually a misnomer since a variety of substances is responsible for these effect. In any case, what you've got here is something I term a "greasy ghost". Die fill ( "grease") of just the right consistency and viscosity tends to flow toward the area of lowest effective striking pressure, in this case the area opposite Lincoln's bust. The die fill creates a vague, shallow, incuse version of Lincoln's bust. Greasy ghosts occur in other denominations as well.
     
  10. jackeen

    jackeen Senior Member

    mike - I noticed the shape you describe, but couldn't think of the reason for it. Makes sense. Thanks.
     
  11. Jim M

    Jim M Ride it like ya stole it

    Now it makes perfect sense as to why its the way it is.. Thank you Mike. This old dog just learned another trick. Good ole Coin Talk..
     
  12. xeno108

    xeno108 New Member

    Can anybody tell me if what i have is similar to this? I thought it was a grease filled die, but now that I look at it, the wheat back has an outline of Lincoln
     

    Attached Files:

  13. mikediamond

    mikediamond Coin Collector

    What you have is something completely different. It is progressive, indirect design transfer -- a form of die deterioration. A vague image of Lincoln's bust was transferred to the reverse die through the medium of hundreds of thousands of planchets. It's especially common in S-mintmark cents from 1946 - 1848.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page