1869/9 Indian Head Cent

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by centsdimes, Mar 15, 2012.

  1. centsdimes

    centsdimes Active Member

    Does anyone know how the 1869/9 "overdate" Indian head cent came into existence?
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. swish513

    swish513 Penny & Cent Collector

    it is not an overdate. it's actually a repunched date. it's 1869 over 1869.
     
  4. centsdimes

    centsdimes Active Member

    What's the difference?
     
  5. swish513

    swish513 Penny & Cent Collector

    an overdate is when a die is dated for one year, like 1868, but used in another year, like 1869, so they punch a new date on the die.

    a repunched date is when the die is dated 1869, and for whatever reason (wrong spot on the coin, didn't punch it hard enough the first time, etc.), they punch it again, but don't quite get the date aligned right the second time.
     
  6. centsdimes

    centsdimes Active Member

    I just bought this one.
     

    Attached Files:

  7. centsdimes

    centsdimes Active Member

    Thanks.
     
  8. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    It's hard to tell but it looks as if the 6 is repunched as well.
    If that is true it would be an 1869/69.
     
  9. Jim M

    Jim M Ride it like ya stole it

    Looks like an S-4.
     
  10. centsdimes

    centsdimes Active Member

    Yes, it IS hard. I bought a loupe just to examine this coin. I've never used one before. You have to get just the right angle to see the second nine. There is the tiniest evidence of a second six on top.
     
  11. centsdimes

    centsdimes Active Member

    Is there a website where I can see what an S-4 is?
     
  12. mackwork

    mackwork Caretaker of old coins & currency

    Those different Snow attributions can indeed be hard to see without magnification. I have 7 or 8 different ones now.
     
  13. Victor

    Victor Coin Collector

    There are at least 15 varieties of this repunch. Some have just a doubled 9 and some have 69/69. The Snow-1 has a doubled 18.
     
  14. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    This is a great site but I'm not seeing an image of the S-4.
    http://indiancent.wikispaces.com/
     
  15. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    Sorry. Double post.
     
  16. Jim M

    Jim M Ride it like ya stole it

  17. Pedro1

    Pedro1 New Member

    In what year was the 1869/9 posted in the Redbook as a 1869/9 rather than as a 1869/8?
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page