so which one of these is fake ...the spanish coin may have been a work in progress but the coin it was to become was the fake the host coin is real
I'll defer posting an intelligent reply (at this time) to your nonsensical remarks. However, I'm sure one of the more experienced members will come along and help you with your dilemma.
people who think they know everything about a coin that has little to no information available I dont understand how people can make fun of information that is documented... based on history fact especially when they have nothing to back them up what is the meaning of ignorant ........a perfect example has been demonstrated
You know what I love??? When people take historical facts and twist them for the sake of argument. When in actuality the historical facts have absolutely nothing to do with the item in question.
I think they are posting this because in one of the multiple threads they started about the "continental curency" piece, someone made the comment that all the pieces in one of their attachments were fake. A statement that was manifestly untrue. I think the only piece I have seen them post that was fake is the "continential curency" piece that they have been obsessing over. The only one that would have any significant value if it was real.
