NGC vs. PCGS customer service

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by Owle, Feb 23, 2012.

  1. treehugger

    treehugger Well-Known Member

    After reading Owle's post, I immediately relinquish every rightful claim to being King of the Chauvanists.
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Hunt1

    Hunt1 Active Member

    What's her email?
     
  4. TheCoinGeezer

    TheCoinGeezer Senex Bombulum

    My own opinion of Don Willis is that not only is he an ego-maniacal idiot but that his behavior is a public relations nightmare for PCGS.
     
  5. cpm9ball

    cpm9ball CANNOT RE-MEMBER

    Lisa's e-mail address is not even listed in her personal profile on the NGC forums, so I don't think it would be a good idea to give it to anyone without her permission.

    Chris
     
  6. cpm9ball

    cpm9ball CANNOT RE-MEMBER

    Nope! You're C-1 and he's C-2.

    Chris:devil:
     
  7. Conder101

    Conder101 Numismatist

    LMAO :too-funny:

    I wonder how many here don't get it.
     
  8. cpm9ball

    cpm9ball CANNOT RE-MEMBER

    Abbott & Costello was one of my favorites when I was a kid in prehistoric times. My all-time favorite, though, was "Who's on first?"

    Chris
     
  9. Conder101

    Conder101 Numismatist

    I've got that on an old 78.
     
  10. TheCoinGeezer

    TheCoinGeezer Senex Bombulum

    The 3 Stooges also did that routine.
    But I like the A&C versions best ("Bagel Street" or "Susquehanna Hats")
     
  11. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    You cannot post email addresses on the forum because they will be harvested by the SPAM bots.
     
  12. Mcreagin

    Mcreagin Member

    What series is PCGS tougher than NGC and vice versa?
     
  13. Cazkaboom

    Cazkaboom One for all, all for me.

    I gotta say PCGS is tougher on lincoln cents and NGC is tougher on Franklin halves.
     
  14. I mainly collect Barber Halves, and the last three certified coins I bought were in NGC holders. They, in my mind, are tougher on that series than PCGS. A few of the coins I own are overgraded by PCGS. Even two from my most recent submission. But I have seen B-halves in NGC holders that were overgraded as well. It's all subjective. I pay for the coin, not the plastic. I just prefer mine to be in PCGS plastic.


    Oh and on topic, I haven't had a problem with PCGS customer service yet. I have never dealt with NGC's customer service so I cannot comment on them.
     
  15. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    Now THAT would for sure start an argument ;)

    Ten or twelve years ago you could almost, stress almost, reach a consensus on that subject if you would have polled the members of the various coin forums. That was, in my opinion, because back then most serious collectors were more open minded on the subject. But over the years the polarity of the two camps of fans has increased to the point where you'd stand no chance of doing so today. And you'd also have to understand that 12 years ago NGC didn't even grade coins minted after 1964.

    I used to be able to pretty much list who was tougher on what off the top of my head. Unfortunately I can no longer recall with any degree of certainty. But I'll try and give you a few examples.

    PCGS tougher on Lincolns, Washingtons, Walkers.

    NGC tougher on Jeffs, Mercs, Rosies, Frankies.

    PCGS tougher on Morgans & Peace.

    NGC tougher on gold, especially Saints.

    With Seated and Barbers it was about a toss up.

    As I recall NGC had the edge on old copper - can't recall on IHC's.

    NGC was always tougher on any coin with special designations.

    Let the slings and arrows begin to fly :D
     
  16. Owle

    Owle Junior Member

    NGC addresses some of the grading issues in the Rosen Numismatic advisory; here's a segment, and since NGC has it on their website, it is in the public domain: - No, it isn't. Everything on the NGC web site is copyright protected.

    MR: I agree, there’s been a learning curve at work. I believe that the early years of NGC and PCGS saw conservative grading because they were young companies out to prove themselves, get market share, introducing a new concept. You yielded a lot of power and had to be careful, earn your “oats,” so to speak. Does this make sense?


    http://www.ngccoin.com/news/viewarticle.aspx?IDArticle=2259&

    edited
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page