1894 Morgan - Grade It!

Let me have it!

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

Ms65

 

Its got an interesting die clash thats for sure. i don't like that hit on the check but the reverse is nice

 

63 but most likely details - scratched.

 

65 without the ding.... but the question is what's the ding deduction.

I'll say 1...64

 

MS63- Multiple deep abrasions.

-Brian

 

I guess I'm blind! What clash?

MS Details - Damaged (gouged and scratched)

Chris

 

ms64. Don't know if the scratches are enough to warrant "details/scratched." BTW that's an 1884 Morgan not a 1894 per the thread title. You had me excited.

 

The scratch above the 3 left stars appears to be from a staple, and it would definitely cause a no-grade. The gouge on her cheek doesn't look like anything that may have happened either at the Mint or while in bag storage. It's too straight, so I would think it might be considered damage, too.

Chris

 

ms63

 

Not even on it's worse day is that a 65 with that distracting mark on the cheek, the scratch under the chin, and behind the bonnet.

Details, Scratched maybe a Damaged, no grade.

 

net 63

 

Unc details, scratched.

 

UNC details at P/N/A; Numerical grade at SEGS, etc.

It looks like the moon at a particular phase with the lighting.

 

1884 Anacs or Icg would grade it and not body bag it due gouge or obv scratch.
MS-63 but maybe MS-64 as the rev is very nice.
but also maybe detailed as scratched or die gouge or even a Vam if Anacs grades all MD w/Vam detail for free.
you never know mood the graders will be in when they look at this one if you get graded.
:kewl:

 

Unc details, scratched., if grades .. then 63/ 64+ with details..

 

Is that circulation wear in the hair above ear and above eye -- and on eagle's chest?

 

MS-details. Just to harsh a hit.

 

Melt too much damage if it were any other date. Details AU because of what it is.