i have a 1969s lincoln cent with clear boubling on the date..im cunfused cause iv'e read different articles with different info..theres double die and double strike whats the difference. i know ones a problem with the die and one the strike, but iv'e seen the double die on coppercoins.com but they look the same to me..please help.
Chance are 99.99% you have machine doubling, which is common and adds no value. In fact, it is considered damage by collectors. The correct term is doubED die (with a D on the end) as there is no suching as using two dies to strike a coin (double die). I suggest you do some reading on the subject so you understand it better: http://doubleddie.com/58222.html A "double struck" coin is not a variety like the doubled die, it is an error that can happen when a coin fails to eject and it is thus struck twice.
Havieman, you have a Machine doublling ( MD). It is noticed by the flattened doubled area. The reason posters are mentioning the "s" mint mark, is that at that time, the mint added the mark to the working die with a punch and a couple of blows. If the workman was "off", the doubled effect was called a repunched mint mark, but it wasn't from a doubling on the working die production. So these are 2 rare unusual events and for both to occur on the same occasion ( a true doubled die that was repunched) would be almost never and if it had happened, it would be a documented event. The only time I know it has happened is the 1960 D/D small date/large date DDO with RPM 100. Note the repunched ( way off) mint mark at the green arrows. Date shows the Doubled die ( DDO). Jim
thanks jim i was wondering is it worth anything? or is to common to be worth anything? and thanks again for your input..no one has been able to explain it the you did.
i have a susan b with what looks like doubling on the america..i can't get a good pic cause its in cello..have you heard of any errors?
This site will show you all the non-collectible types of doubling: http://koinpro.tripod.com/Articles/OtherFormsOfDoubling.htm