PCGS damage...?

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by Ladies First, Jul 23, 2011.

?

PCGS damage or Pre-existing Condition?

  1. PCGS scuffed up the coins in-house.

    80.0%
  2. Submitter needs his eyes checked!

    20.0%
  1. Ladies First

    Ladies First Since 2007

    ...or did I miss it when deciding to send 'em in?

    I've been sending Spouse coins to PCGS since '07 and I can't believe I missed the minor damage on these two coins, especially the scuff on the proof that's right in the field above IGWT. I don't mind 69's but I wouldn't have sent these in if I'd seen it beforehand. Is it possible that damage happens at PCGS or is that highly unlikely?

    (I will be taking a moment to document my submissions from now on no matter what y'all say!)

    PS- the scuff on the MS is also in the field, Below the left side of the E in Eliza.
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. HowardStern

    HowardStern Member

    I wouldnt have sent those in...would you? It happens to everyone from time to time Im sure. NGC just told me a clipper I found myself in an unc roll was pmd!
     
  4. wooleytree

    wooleytree Operation Flamingo

    Hard to say but I think everyone that is on this forum has dropped or accidentally scuffed a coin. PCGS, NGC or anyone of the TPG's has the potential to do the same.
     
  5. Ladies First

    Ladies First Since 2007

    Hmm, I already want to edit my poll! #1 should say that it is POSSIBLE that PCGS damaged it, not that it's a for sure thing!

    PS-
    PCGS had to remove them from the Mint Capsule... I did open them first for quality control.
     
  6. chip

    chip Novice collector

    I have seen people post pics before and afters, where the coin came back with a huge old fingerprint. So I would say it is possible, but just try to prove it!
     
  7. Ladies First

    Ladies First Since 2007

    A think a fingerprint would be harder to prove as it can take some time to appear...
     
  8. DMiller

    DMiller Junior Member

    But then you can take it to the CSI lab and prove it's not your fingerprint, and had to have been the slabber! :D
     
  9. phdunay

    phdunay Member

    I heard a story where PCGS fingerprinted a proof coin, then got a complaint about it after they sent it back to the customer, they denied and claimed it was textile toning.
     
  10. WingedLiberty

    WingedLiberty Well-Known Member

    why PCGS handles all coins with bare hands is beyond me ... haven't they ever heard of cotton gloves?
     
  11. Ladies First

    Ladies First Since 2007

    Pushing coins into folders, I've put marks on my coins from cotton gloves that look like fingerprints but they're the ridges from the weave of the fabric. Now I push with a new piece of paper!
     
  12. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    I have never even heard of a professional, be that a grader, a dealer, an authenticator, or even an advanced collector, that wears gloves to handle a coin. The reason is quite simple, it's because gloves cause the wearer to lose dexterity with their fingers. And if you lose dexterity it is much more likely that you will drop the coin or fumble it in your hands.
     
  13. Ladies First

    Ladies First Since 2007

    Do they use tongs?
     
  14. WingedLiberty

    WingedLiberty Well-Known Member

    I think they handle the coins with their bare hands (oils, grime, dirt, body acids, taco sauce from lunch, and all)
     
  15. LindeDad

    LindeDad His Walker.

    Nitrite gloves are used in many industries including circuit board manufacture now.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page