Coins Back From The New ANACS

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Charlie32, Mar 13, 2006.

  1. Charlie32

    Charlie32 Coin Collector

    I got my coins back from ANACS today. I sent them in on economy on 1-17-06. The grades are:

    1868 Shield Nickel AU-58, My grade MS-60
    1947 Walking Liberty Half MS-65, My grade MS-63
    1959 Proof Franklin Half PF-67, My grade PF-66
    1880-S Morgan Dollar PF-63 PL, My grade MS-60 PL
    1962 Proof Franklin Half PF-66 OBV Cameo, Cracked out of a ACG PF-67, My grade PF-66
    1961 Proof Franklin Half PF-66 OBV Cameo, My grade PF-66 Cameo
    1962 Proof Franklin Half PF-64, My grade PF-66 OBV Cameo
    1898 Morgan Dollar MS-62, My grade MS-63

    Charlie
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Charlie32

    Charlie32 Coin Collector

    Here is the 1868 Nickel.
     

    Attached Files:

  4. tcore

    tcore Coin Collector

    That's a very nice looking shield nickel. I really like the toning...very natural looking. Congratulations on the grades too. It looks like you did pretty well for yourself.
     
  5. 09S-V.D.B

    09S-V.D.B Coin Hoarder

    1. Congrats on the grades. :thumb:

    2. Not only is it a new day for ANACS, it is a new month (or two or three) for Economy. :headbang:

    3. You did great looking at the pics of that 1880-S, I was (and still am) positive that coin was dipped. Guess the pros disagree. :eek: Proof PL, that is one of a kind.
     
  6. Just Carl

    Just Carl Numismatist

    Those coins are to nice for you. I suggest you just mail them to me. I'll kept them for you so you won't have the burden of finding a place for them.
     
  7. Charlie32

    Charlie32 Coin Collector

    Here are some pics of the 1947 MS-65 Walker. Do you think the gash in the sun's rays limits it to a 64?

    Charlie
     

    Attached Files:

  8. zaneman

    zaneman Former Moderator

    I personally would grade that walker a 64. That gash is definitely what I would consider to be a detracting mark. As for the 1880-s, that coin was very pretty, but definitely not an ms-63!
     
  9. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    I'm just about convinced about the "new" ANACS :(

    I would grade that coin a 63. Yeah the gash is part of it, but the strike on the left hand and the eagle's leg just isn't deserving of more.
     
  10. Richard01

    Richard01 Senior Member

    I sent over 20 coins to ANAC's in 4 orders. I don't know. I have seen grading a bit inconsistent. My buffalo (which had no wear but was a weak strike) was graded AU, and I strongly feel this is in error, other coins were graded a bit high. I have resubmitted several coins to NGC, where I have had more consistency laterly. I do love the new holders, though, and I hate the white NGC ones...
     
  11. Burks

    Burks New Member

    Either way those coins still sound very nice and would put to shame mine :)

    Your grading wasn't very far off either! Now that is impressive.
     
  12. Richard01

    Richard01 Senior Member

    Here is an example I'm struggling with on an ANACs order. I sent this coin in, confident it was a 64. It came back a 62. Look at any definition of 62... where are the marks that would drop this coin to a 62? If someone sees something I don't feel free to tell me!
     

    Attached Files:

  13. zaneman

    zaneman Former Moderator

    It looks to me like there is a thumbprint on the obverse, which I think would limit it to a 62, but I could be mistaken.
     
  14. Richard01

    Richard01 Senior Member

    The toning does follow what I think is a textile pattern. I suppose it could be a thumbprint, but two things would tend to make me think not. First it would seem odd that a thumb print would tone blue, and secondly, the pattern is much larger than the pattern of a thumbprint. Perhaps that is what the grader thought, however. I certainly don't see the nicks I'd expect in an MS62.
     
  15. happycobra

    happycobra Senior Member

    Don’t know. I think she’s rather lovely.
     
  16. Speedy

    Speedy Researching Coins Supporter

    The nickel looks alittle weakly struck....nickel is hard to strike anyway but the hair doesn't look like its full.

    Speedy
     
  17. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator


    There are more things than marks that can drop the grade. For example, take a close look at the stars. Some of them are quite well struck with full detail while others are nearly dead flat. Same with the hair & crown. On the reverse the E & N in CENTS are quite weak as are some of the finer details in the wreath. Then there is luster - while the luster on the obverse appears to be quite good, there appears to be very little on the reverse. And eye appeal plays a part - for some folks the mottled toning can be a detraction. Of course that part is rather subjective and could easily change depending on the grader.

    Also you should take into account that ANACS is, used to be at least, tougher on grading nickels than any of the other grading companies. Even so, I would say the coin should grade a tad better than 62 - I'd say 63.
     
  18. Richard01

    Richard01 Senior Member

    Don't get me wrong... I'm not interested in selling this coin, nor am I going to crack it out. I can be happy knowing that I have at the minimum a PQ MS62. No chance of anyone feeling this is overgraded! I love the blue on this coin, and intend to keep it for a very long time. All that being said, I do wish it had graded at least MS63, but that is mostly emotional over the fact that I paid MS63+ money for it. However, I'd say that if I had to sell, the great blue toning would drive enough of a price shift for a toned collector to more than make up for the shortfall in grades.
    Such is the life of buying raw and then holdering...
     
  19. Speedy

    Speedy Researching Coins Supporter

  20. mrbrklyn

    mrbrklyn New Member

  21. Speedy

    Speedy Researching Coins Supporter

    Nope---they are about the size of a dime...

    Speedy
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page