Sometimes I think dealers intentionally misidentify a few things just to make guys like me think they are getting something. This is one of the more frequently misidentified late Romans and one I believe all high school Latin teachers should own. Can you ID it? Experts may let the beginners have first shot but I bought this one misidentified by a dealer who has been in business for decades so the problem may be worse than I thought.
For those who might have trouble reading the entire obverse legend, it's: FLCONSTANTISBEAC Not really a clue, just a clarification.
I actually just bought this coin today and was going to ask if anyone can help me with the value of it. I didn't pay a lot for it but its not in as good condition as this one is. Answer: Constantine I
I just identified one here. A related question I have is: what makes this legend variation so special? Is it just less encountered? How much is my coin? I imagine at least 10 times the value of a common legend variation, so maybe $75. First one I’ve encountered I believe in many uncleaned lots
Well I would say the OP is Constans as Caesar between 333 and 337 AD. Reverse is Gloria Exercitus and the mint is clearly Siscia with a Delta in front for 4th issue - so around 335AD. S18350 in my Sear book. Book does not make this one scarce - £7 in VF (book printed 2014). Second one is same obverse, but we can go no further without the reverse.
To me it looks like the celator forgot the U(orV) in Constantius . Perhaps he was a bad speller (like me) .
