Consecutive Ones

I have two consectutive One's, 2009 series. Both have the #'s 66 within the SN, twice on the one particular note.

Would these be considered worth keeping?

Thanks,

lara4228

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

Even though I don't collect paper, I know something: The bills are uncirculated.

 

Uncirculated? I'm from Canada, I received these bills the other day in my store. Which I would think would make them Circulated, especially because I am not the issuing country?

Perhaps I'm not familiar with the terms Circulated vs. Uncirculated in terms of money?

 

unless the serial numbers in a dollar bill have something unique like binary, repeaters, or radar notes, I would spend them.

 

There is nothing uncommon both sequential notes unless they are reallllly old.

I would spend them.

 

Uncirculated is a definition of the CONDITION of a bill. Even if the bill has passed through 100 hands if there is absolutly no sign that the bill has passed through those hands then the bill would still be considered uncirculated.

 

Spending them I will. Well, actually, I will bank them in my account to spend later

As for the circulation definition. Thank you. I thought I read that definition a couple of times, but when I actually read it in reference, I wanted to make sure I understood.

New and full of questions.

Thanks a lot for all the info everyone!

lara4228

 

I hate to rain on your parade....but those are "spenders"

 

lol thanks

 

I get consecutive bills on a regular basis. Often times at the bank you can get several dozen consecutives/bills with close serial numbers. Sorry, but they're worth face

 

Anybody who says spend em, I agree