Are the marks below the hair (the deep ones) scratches? I collect dimes, and I haven't seen one like that Anyway: 66 FT
66+ MAYBE FT...I am not sure if that is toning or possibly some type of dirt or foreign marterial in it. Why do you say that the 1953-d is overlooked?
I go with what Merc said. MS67 FT! Hopefully that nick on the reverse wasn't accounted for....LOL Beautiful coin, congrats.
Jello, that had to be because of that nick on the reverse below the torch. Beautiful coin tho indeed.