What will PCGS say? Coin 3 of 10 - 1839 large cent

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Leadfoot, Feb 8, 2011.

  1. Leadfoot

    Leadfoot there is no spoon

    Here's coin #3 from the submission.

    This coin was sent in raw to PCGS. What will PCGS grade the coin (or if they don't grade it, what reason will they give)?

    [​IMG][​IMG]

    Similar to the last sets of photos, these shots were taken to accentuate the color and not the luster, so as a result the coin's luster looks a bit flatter than it does in real life.

    I bought this coin from Tom Reynolds, a well known EAC dealer, at FUN in 2007. He EAC graded the coin 50+/50, and it came with an enclosed PCGS label (I won't reveal the grade). I graded it $675 and purchased it for that price.

    What will PCGS say?
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. EyeEatWheaties

    EyeEatWheaties Cent Hoarder

    depends on what side of bed they wake up on. :devil:


    65 - 66 ????
     
  4. KoinJester

    KoinJester Well-Known Member

    My guess though don't do a lot of early coppers is
    Genuine/ questionable color
     
  5. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    I'll guess AU-58.
     
  6. Marshall

    Marshall Junior Member

    I'll go with AU58 only because there appears to be a little discoloration on the highest parts of the coin and nothing else distracting from a choice coins. I net grade it MS 63 BN.
     
  7. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    Again I would agree with Reynolds' grade of 50. The coin has even and obvious wear on virtually all the high points of both the obv and rev as well as light wear in the fields. Now some may argue that it's not wear but a weak strike, but it isn't. The coin is actually very well struck as indicated by the sharpness and clarity of all the details and thus what we see is the result of wear not a weak strike. Wear is also indicated by the remains of grime in the recesses. That also indicates that the coin has been dipped, which would account for somewhat subdued luster.

    As for what PCGS will say - it will no doubt be higher than 50 but it will not be justified.
     
  8. oval_man

    oval_man Elliptical member

    I have to go AU58. The strike is very good but not exceptional, therefore the wear is minimal.

    Nice coin!
     
  9. Lugia

    Lugia ye olde UScoin enthusiast

    AU 53 again tho i have a feeling pcgs is going to continue its chain of gradeflation.
     
  10. 900fine

    900fine doggone it people like me

    I think they'll call it AU55. Clearly it has rub, but it has a good strike, an early die state, and a hard planchet. Lovely coin IMO.

    I see no reason the tiny rim nicks above stars 5 and 10 should cause a problem, but the red patch in the denticles above star 9 might. Good luck !
     
  11. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    I see the rub, but that is not the question. I have coins with "obvious" rubs graded as MS and a couple I find no rub, but are "AU". I will guess they called this one 58, but I would not be surprised if they gave it an MS.
     
  12. oval_man

    oval_man Elliptical member

    I was wondering about that color, too, but don't have enough experience with re-colored coins to really know.
     
  13. GeorgeM

    GeorgeM Well-Known Member

    Bookmarking this so that I can check back when you post the two grades side-by-side...
     
  14. mark_h

    mark_h Somewhere over the rainbow

    I will say AU55, but that might be me short changing the coin off the big pictures. Now what are the spots under E in states and inside E in one? Another nice coin.
     
  15. oval_man

    oval_man Elliptical member

    I've also been wondering about the large patch of color on Liberty's hair at the very back of her neck, kind of a rust hue. Also under the 5th star. They're a similar but not exact tone to the dentils at 2:00, at least in the photo.

    There looks to be a tiny bit of this color on top of the spots that mark_h just mentioned, or am I imagining things?
     
  16. sro114

    sro114 New Member

    I'm guessing 58
     
  17. ikes4ever

    ikes4ever Senior Member

    yeah they will inflate that to at least a 58
     
  18. Leadfoot

    Leadfoot there is no spoon

    They are small spots/areas of light corrosion. Quite common on large cents. Look back on the 1818 (coin #1) and you'll see the same thing. Not really problematic as they haven't really affected the surfaces (i.e. no granularity), and the coin would be more desirable if they weren't there -- but most copper collectors I know don't worry about them much on circulated coins. To be frank, I'd be more worried about the coin if they weren't there.
     
  19. oval_man

    oval_man Elliptical member

    Got it. The way you have this challenge set up is causing us (at least me) to question all aspects of the coin—which is a good thing! I can't imagine you buying a copper without original surfaces and I wouldn't have questioned this coin's originality otherwise, but your "PCGS challenge" has me doing just that. Good educational exercise.
     
  20. Leadfoot

    Leadfoot there is no spoon

    Just wait. ;)
     
  21. thecoinczar

    thecoinczar Member

    Perfect milk chocolate color and gorgeous throughout!
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page