Guess the grade 93-S Morgan

Discussion in 'What's it Worth' started by jrr888, Dec 22, 2010.

  1. jrr888

    jrr888 ANA# R3158442

    What do you think? This is in a Rattler case and I believe it's under graded.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. texmech

    texmech Wanna be coin collector

  4. mark_h

    mark_h Somewhere over the rainbow

    I assume you mean an old PCGS rattler - looks AU to me. I can't get a good feel for any luster remaining.
     
  5. RaceBannon

    RaceBannon Member

  6. jello

    jello Not Expert★NormL®

    Thanks for sharing this one

    EF-45 to AU-50 if Pcgs graded it
     
  7. Bedford

    Bedford Lackey For Coin Junkies

  8. BALD SPARTAN

    BALD SPARTAN Member

    IMO due to the lack of mint luster (looks cleaned at one time ),the rounded look of the stars,the wear above the ear in the hairline and in the eagles breast feathers on the reverse I think its a AU coin.
     
  9. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    That looks like a not so great strike AU to me. 50?
     
  10. jrr888

    jrr888 ANA# R3158442

    Now why would you say that?
     
  11. prolawn_care

    prolawn_care New Member

    EF 45. The hair above the ears is pretty worn, the breast feathers are almost gone. And there are quite a few contact marks, and possiably cleaned. It's eaither EF-45 or EF-45 cleaned.
     
  12. Merc Crazy

    Merc Crazy Bumbling numismatic fool

    I have trouble grading XF-AU Morgans. I'll say that's an XF45 or thereabouts... doesn't look clean enough to get an AU from me... maybe an AU50 at best.
     
  13. coinmaster1

    coinmaster1 Active Member

    Because 1893-S is one of, and is, the rarest Morgan you can buy (besides some of the earlier patterns).
     
  14. jrr888

    jrr888 ANA# R3158442

    I was being sarcastic...their are alot of folks on here that will yell fake just for fun because they don't know...
     
  15. tmoneyeagles

    tmoneyeagles Indian Buffalo Gatherer

    Oddly enough I am getting the same vibe. Nothing to justify it other than a feeling.

    Since the coin was graded by PCGS, and you say you feel it is undergraded, I'm going to say the called it EF40.
     
  16. jrr888

    jrr888 ANA# R3158442

    You win!!!!
     
  17. FishyOne

    FishyOne Member

    Does look undergraded at 40. 50 might be a stretch by 45 sounds about right.
     
  18. texmech

    texmech Wanna be coin collector

    It has good detail, but lack of luster and almost a cast look from what I saw in the pictures, but obviously the others do not think so.
     
  19. tmoneyeagles

    tmoneyeagles Indian Buffalo Gatherer

    It does kinda have the "I'll stick to a magnet" look.
    I don't see anything else that makes it a fake though.
     
  20. Market Harmony

    Market Harmony supplier, buyer, refiner

    With what appears to be some remaining luster near the edges, especially on the reverse, I'd have put it at 50... but pictures can deceive. More definition in the breast feathers is needed for higher than 50
     
  21. ratio411

    ratio411 Active Member

    IMO 40 is perfect.
    Any higher and it's overgraded. (again, IMO)
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page