Silver Eagles (lower mintage dates of the mid 90s)

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by WingedLiberty, Oct 14, 2010.

  1. WingedLiberty

    WingedLiberty Well-Known Member

    Can someone tell me why a 1996 ASE is the only coin in the series that carries a premium (selling for between $50 to $60), while all the other dates sell for the bullion price of $27 or so?

    My first thought was the 1996 ASE is way overpriced.

    1996T.jpg

    The 1994 and 1997 also have fairly low mintages, within a few hundred thou. of the
    series low mintage of 1996 -- but they dont appear to carry any premium.

    Does this mean the 1996 is truely overpriced? Or instead that the 1994 and 1997, might someday have a more significant premium and might be a good gamble to buy at near the bullion price?

    I think that Krispy has been posting that he thinks if the ASE program ended,
    that some of the ASE's will start to get more of a premium.

    I think that's an interesting thought considering the total mintage of the ASE series
    is now roughly around the series mintage of the Peace Dollar -- (around 200 million)
    and we all know how key dates of the Peace series have shot up.
    Of course the entire population of ASEs were saved and in UNC condition - something
    definitely not true of the Peace series which was issued as a legal tender coin.

    Here are the mintages of the ASE series (note the explosion in numbers
    in the past couple of years) it makes some of the mintages
    in the mid 1990s look even lower.

    Year Mintage
    1986 5,393,005
    1987 11,442,335
    1988 5,004,646
    1989 5,203,327
    1990 5,840,210
    1991 7,191,066
    1992 5,540,068
    1993 6,763,762
    1994 4,227,319
    1995 4,672,051
    1996 3,603,386
    1997 4,295,004
    1998 4,847,549
    1999 7,408,640
    2000 9,239,132
    2001 9,001,711
    2002 10,539,026
    2003 8,495,008
    2004 8,882,754
    2005 8,891,025
    2006 10,676,522
    2007 9,028,036
    2008 20,583,000
    2009 30,459,000
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    You've already answered your own question - it's because of the mintage number, which is stupid. If it's any consolation it used to be higher.
     
  4. WingedLiberty

    WingedLiberty Well-Known Member

    well ... my point was the mintage of the 1996 is not that much lower than the 1994 and 1997 ... so it seems a bit crazy to say the 1996 is worth double ... and the 1994, 1997 has no premium.
     
  5. The 1996 ASE is clearly overpriced and it is based solely on having the lowest mintage in the raw bullion ASE series. At the rate they have been selling in recent years, you can assume that this will likely remain the case. Now, if these start getting melted at some point and/or the series ends, IMO they will start to develop numismatic value as well. TC
     
  6. Coinguy56

    Coinguy56 Member

    1996 is the key date to the series and it turns out that the year I was born was the key date...lol I feel special. I paid like $50 for mine in Unc uncertified. ASE's are really nice coins to collect, but I just wanted my birth year and key date. :smile
     
  7. WingedLiberty

    WingedLiberty Well-Known Member

    I hear you coinguy! Am I reading your post correctly that you are only 14? If that's true it's great to see a younger collector on here (I see so few).

    I just acquired series key 1996 ASE that might be graded MS70 (it's at least MS69) as part of a complete ASE set collection for really no significant premium.

    I bought the complete set of ASE's in an dansco for $719 yesterday from my local coin dealer; and the dealer let me cherry pick a 1996 from 5 rolls (and I found one that looks flawless).

    Since this set contains 25 oz silver, just the melt value of the ASEs is around $615 at this mornings spot price (about $100 premium over melt for 25 coins, which i thought was a great price).

    Tell you what, it's really cool seeing the whole series in an album, especially when most of the coins look like MS69s+ to me. Sorry about the bad photo ... i really need to work on my photography skills.

    ASE_Dansco2.jpg

    This morning I just bought Littleton's ASE Album (which I think is the
    nicest looking album ... not fond of Dansco's tan page color);
    and I will transfer the coins to that (wearing gloves of course!)

    [​IMG]
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page