Is this a proof? 1979 half dollar.

Discussion in 'What's it Worth' started by mitchelliii, Aug 22, 2010.

  1. mitchelliii

    mitchelliii Junior Member

    Surface is mirror like, Kennedy is not reflective etc.
    Found this in a roll from the bank.
    1979 half dollar 001.jpg

    Also - where is a good place to get halves by the bag etc?

    Cheers,

    Scott
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Ltrain

    Ltrain New Member

    All Kennedys from 1971 (Or earlier? Not sure) and later with an S mintmark will be proofs.
     
  4. mitchelliii

    mitchelliii Junior Member

    I know the colors look off - it's from the scanner light at an angle. It shows how reflective this is on the surface.
    1979 half dollar relief 001.jpg
     
  5. green18

    green18 Unknown member Sweet on Commemorative Coins

    Nice find.....:)
     
  6. vnickels

    vnickels Matt Draiss Numismatics & Galleries

    I would say Proof!
     
  7. bigjpst

    bigjpst Well-Known Member

    Cool find . Definately a proof. I find one in about every 7-8 boxes I search. Almost as nice as finding the 40%'s
     
  8. swhuck

    swhuck Junior Member

    All Kennedys with an S mintmark, period... except for the 1976-S silver clad uncs and the Matte finish 1998-S in the RFK set. If you find an S mintmark on a Kennedy it's a good thing. :)
     
  9. Ltrain

    Ltrain New Member

    I have a few distinctly non-prooflike ones from the late '60's.
     
  10. swhuck

    swhuck Junior Member

    Doesn't matter. All dimes, quarters, and halves with an S mintmark from the 60s were proofs.

    1968-S and 1969-S nickels and cents were made for circulation, and the San Francisco Mint made a number of circulating coins without mintmarks in 1965-67.
     
  11. Ltrain

    Ltrain New Member

    Huh, that's a crappy proof then... Were the SMS sets from San Fran too? Those technically aren't proofs. ;)
     
  12. swhuck

    swhuck Junior Member

    They were, but the coins were not made with mintmarks.

    And I've heard the argument that they technically *were* proofs, but just not called that. :)
     
  13. Ltrain

    Ltrain New Member

    Ahh, right, I should have known this, found a PL '65 quarter recently.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page