From The Official American Numismatic Association Grading Standards 6th Edition: VG-8 Obverse: Hair ends and curls are smooth but show some detail, LIBERTY is readable. The eye and ear are visible. Stars and date are clear. Since there is no trace of an ear on this coin how can PCGS assign it a grade of VG-8? http://cgi.ebay.com/1814-Classic-He...em&pt=Coins_US_Individual&hash=item5adb04da89
I agree. This does NOT look like a VG-8. I've heard of PCGS slabs being forged, and I think this one is a prime candidate. This is CLEARLY not that high of a grade. I would guess AG-3 or G-4 at best.
Shill bidder, but with only 2 bidders a whole $1 over minimum, you are going to have to explain how you figure that. ESP?
I agree with both of these statements. I am not thinking counterfeit slab, but, couldn't venture a guess as to why it was so overgraded, let alone graded numerically. I agree with rlm's cents, statement also....I don't see shilling at all with only 2 bidders.....need to see the activity, but with the first bid placed 5 days after listing, and the 5%, and 6% activity with the listing party, the 2 bidders that placed bids gives me no reason to suspect shilling...but stranger things have happened. As for being pricey? It's right at CU price guide now, so, I don't see it being TOO overpriced....and what happens when you get 2 bidders that want the same coin? You usually see a price a bit elevated anyway. Nothing fishy or out of place, in my opinion...but I've been wrong before (at least once or twice....oh, wait, I was also VERY VERY wrong when I decided to put together an FDI Prez Dollar Registry set.....with the rapid depreciation, I could have paid a whole semester's tuition...lol...no more ultra-moderns for me!!)
To answer your question - they can do it because they do not follow the ANA standards. They have their own, different set of standards. But in this case, as in many like I continually try to remind people, they do not even follow their own standards. The PCGS standards for VG8/10 Large Cents 1808-1814 VG8/10 coins have little hair detail, and LIBERTY may have several weak letters. John Reich's Clasic Head design had relief not seen since the high-relief varieties of the Liberty Cap cents, with detail shown down to the lowest grades. The bust is almost always boldly outlined, and the obverse rim is usually bold. The leaves will be worn into each other and have little detail, though the wreath is usually well outlined. Rverse rims may be incomplete, causing slight weakness to the upper parts of the lettering. Now there is no detail whatsoever in the hair and the obverse rim is not even complete let alone bold. So this coin in no way meets the given PCGS standards either.
Well, it is out of line in my opinion, however the certification is valid. see here: http://www.pcgs.com/Cert/16560193.html
Actually I am watching that auction. I would put this coin at G-4 to G-6, but I also think the color and solid looks of the planchet drive a little premium. To me that is the perfect classic head to collect. A little over priced, but not much. Plus - here lately all the ebay auctions I have watched are going a little high in my opinion.
Yes, the coin is overgraded by ANA standards. No, I don't think it's a counterfeit slab. Yes, the TPGs use their own standards, but they shouldn't. I feel everyone should use one set of standards - the ANA book. I agree with mark_h... for a classic head 1c, the coin has a pretty good flan and overall nice color . Maybe PCGS gave it a little market grade bump up for that reason. I can see how someone might pay VG8 money for this one.
In a way, you're indicating PCGS may have added to the net grade because of better than normal condition. This is something I think SHOULD happen to CHOICE coins. Now whether that should happen to THIS coin is a matter of debate. The difference is about $35 between G4 ($50) and G8 ($85) in the 2010 Redbook. Are the surfaces worth it on a Classic Head where nice surfaces and even wear are scarce? Could be. Perhaps a G6/net G8? ps Some bumps and bruises are permitted on lower grade material. The question is whether there is less than typical for the grade.
There is a big difference there. Shill bidding is against eBay's rules and can get the seller removed. Stupid bids are all welcomed by the seller. However, now there are 3 and I am guessing there will be more before it ends.
I am not too surprised with the grade. You noted a couple of things, but I see a trace of the ear. Overall it is a nice planchet which is rare on these issues. Honestly, without a grade assigned, I would have given it g6-vg8 and not been surprised with either grade. Right now its $108, so I think that is out of line, not the grade per se.
It is Ebay. I've made a couple of high bids there myself recently. Usually it's because I think I see something that isn't there.
Maybe there is a trace of ear, but the detail is well short of the ANA photo for VG. This coin has G details.