Is this toning natural?

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by Pilkenton, May 12, 2010.

  1. Pilkenton

    Pilkenton almost uncirculated

    If it's not, does it decrease the value of the coin?
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    Yes, it is AT. Yes, it does decrease the value of the coin. Luckily, the coin was not worth much in the first place - it looks like a heavily dipped and AT'd AU common date coin, so its pretty much worth its silver value.
     
  4. BR549

    BR549 Junior Member

    Feeble attempt to create rim toning by placing another object of a smaller diameter on both the obverse and reverse, before being chemically treated ...natural toning will not end abruptly as such, but will have a natural blending transition.

    Place a half dollar on the untoned area and see if it fits.
     
  5. Pilkenton

    Pilkenton almost uncirculated

    Thanks. I thought it was AT. I bought it off ebay for 21.00 a few months ago. Back to ebay it goes.
     
  6. Ltrain

    Ltrain New Member


    edited
     
  7. Kevo

    Kevo Junior Member


    edited
     
  8. Leadfoot

    Leadfoot there is no spoon

    It does not appear natural. The tip-off, for me, is the abrupt nature of toned to untoned areas, and the extremely regular circular nature of the toning. Lastly, the lack of pull-back around the devices (date/stars/lettering on obverse) is a warning. At best it's secondary toned, at worst AT. All IMO...Mike
     
  9. Pilkenton

    Pilkenton almost uncirculated

    It just sold on ebay for 38.50.
     
  10. Ltrain

    Ltrain New Member

    Not bad, lol. Way more than I'd ever pay for it... did you state that you weren't sure if the toning was AT or NT?
     
  11. Pilkenton

    Pilkenton almost uncirculated

    I specifically said it was AT.
     
  12. tonedcoins

    tonedcoins New Member

    I agree!
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page