Guess the grade # 4 Seated half Dimes

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by Mark T, Apr 17, 2010.

  1. Mark T

    Mark T Junior Member

    Guess the grade on these two Seated Half Dimes.
    Feel free to post any comments as to why you gave the coin a specific grade.
    Both coins are CAC certified.

     

    Attached Files:

    • 1853.jpg
      1853.jpg
      File size:
      169.5 KB
      Views:
      135
    • 1857.jpg
      1857.jpg
      File size:
      236.5 KB
      Views:
      124
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Tom B

    Tom B TomB Everywhere Else

    I really like that 1853 WA half-dime!
     
  4. JHXHD

    JHXHD Metal Detectorist

    I don't think there are grades for seated right? I can find any grades in my black book...:confused:
     
  5. Mark T

    Mark T Junior Member

    The 1853 is my favorite of the two as well.
     
  6. Leadfoot

    Leadfoot there is no spoon

  7. mark_h

    mark_h Somewhere over the rainbow

    I like 64 for both of them.
     
  8. sunflower

    sunflower New Member

    From a first day grader:

    1853: MS-64 (there is no price note/list for a MS64 in the Red Book, so I do not feel very confident.) - This 1853 had some coloring on the reverse that was attractive to me, but I was not sure if it was environmental staining, or natural toning. The surface was well formed. Definately an uncirculated. Could this be a fake or a treasure? The die appears off center. The rim on the obverse (left) side floats more than I would expect. Since MS-64 are not common for this year? Was it buried? The die placement strikes me as one of the most unique features, as well as the lack of wear. Did you get the pic from a Stack's catalogue? It appears to be from the Philadelphia Mint.

    1857: F-12 (Is the coloring natural?)-

    Thanks again for letting me try.
     
  9. Lugia

    Lugia ye olde UScoin enthusiast

    ms 64
    au 55 - over dipped at some point.
     
  10. bqcoins

    bqcoins Olympic Figure Skating Scoring System Expert

    64 on the 53 and 63 on the 57. I really like that 53.
     
  11. green18

    green18 Unknown member Sweet on Commemorative Coins

    Am I mistaking wear for "poor" or weak stike on the '57?
     
  12. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    I am with leadfoot - 65, 64
     
  13. Leadfoot

    Leadfoot there is no spoon

    After further review (and just to mess with RLM), I think I undergraded the second coin. I think I mistook some JPEG artifacts for nicks.
     
  14. Leadfoot

    Leadfoot there is no spoon

    I suspect you are, but time will tell. :)
     
  15. mpcusa

    mpcusa "Official C.T. TROLL SWEEPER"

    I will say 63 and 64, It just sounds right!!
     
  16. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    To what? 64.1? Mine is going to stay, but you have got to tell us what yours is beside not 64.
     
  17. Leadfoot

    Leadfoot there is no spoon

    I'll go 65 on both.
     
  18. Leadfoot

    Leadfoot there is no spoon

    p.s. and knowing how NGC assigns 66's, one or both of these coins in higher-than-65 graded slabs wouldn't surprise me either (how's that for a out?) -- I see very few contact marks on either coin that would limit the grade.
     
  19. Mark T

    Mark T Junior Member

    I purchased these great looking coins from Mark Feld and subsequently had them both certified by CAC. Mark had a large offering of Half Dimes last year that were consigned to him by a collector. There was many outstanding coins that were offered. I picked out 15 or so coins that I liked and narrowed then down to these two based on Mark’s recommendations and his understanding of what I look for in a coin.
     

    Attached Files:

  20. chip

    chip Novice collector

    Mr. Felds website is one of my coin porn sites.
     
  21. Mark T

    Mark T Junior Member

    LOL !!

    Mark has great coins at very reasonable prices.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page