No. As I mentioned, I believe it conditions and actually protects copper and helps repel spit specks (people talking over a naked coin and "spraying" their tiny drops of spit on it). I do blot them dry and also use a very soft camel hair brush to help remove residue before I holder the coin. I put it on my own coins when I first started collecting and although I have upgraded quite a few of them over the years, the ones I still have look great.
Thad, I respect and applaud your undertaking in putting this book together, and can't even imagine the time, effort, and research that have gone into gathering and organizing all this information. But, I need a favor. Science and chemistry were probably my worst subjects in school and all those big technical-sounding words go way over my head, so I may need to have a "dummy-downed" version of your book just to understand what you're saying!
I would not even have thought of using butane. Too many hassles with butane. Lighter fluid to me means charcoal or Zippo. I would almost be willing to bet Tom is referring to one of those two. BTW, I used to go through about 10,000 gallons of butadiene in a month. Not the worlds nicest stuff in any aspect.
I'm glad this was clarified. In a coin context, I was thinking lighter fluid sold in cans, a liquid used to light charcoal. The quote above is NOT that lighter fluid ! The quote above refers to the cheap plastic lighters sold for 99c at the convenience store checkout. And here is the key : Butane is a gas at room temperature and pressure. I see no way butane isomers would be useful in a coin context. Butane is what Mick Jagger was talking about when he said "Jumpin' Jack Flash it's a gas gas gas!!!" The liquid lighter fluid is probably a mixture of hexanes and heavier common hydrocarbons. But it's irrelevant - don't use lighter fluid.
"lipophilic" loosely means "fat loving". Basically "like dissolves like" i.e. organic solvents dissolve organics (acetone dissolves Coin Care oil). Verdigris is not organic, so an organic solvent will not dissolve it. IOW, it's ineffective (which you already knew). The word "solubulize" means dissolve.
I echo Charmy in applauding your efforts. Perhaps consider your "target audience". If your intended audience is rank and file hobbyists, almost everyone will need a "dummy-downed" version. Case in point : the snippet above. Charmy already knew everything necessary - that organic solvents won't help with verdigris. And yet, the language lost her ! The problem isn't the audience - it's the language, unless the intent is to reach only chemists and chemical engineers.
Generally, they use naphtha (naphthalene) and I have seen toluene. Nothing nearly so light as hexane. I see nothing wrong with using the ingredients if they were pure. However, I suspect these are some of the worst refined materials they can find.
Yes, excellent point. The verdigris removal sections are only random thoughts at the moment. It's a work in progress. I will modify the section to specify naphtha. Thanks
Charmy, the terms are well explained throughout the book and there's sections before this one where it's all spelled out. By the time you get to this section (nearer to the end), you willl have (hopefully) grasped the terms. If not, there's a glossy and hypertext that will help you here and there.
Yes, it will take some effort to read and understand the book. There's no two ways about it. I'm writing it because of a serious dearth of information on verdigris. It's a scientific undertaking, there's no avoiding the correct scientific terms. Like I said, by the time a reader gets to this point in the book, they should have learned the terms.
Oh why not. Just to add "fuel" to the fire - liquid lighter fluid (the kind used for zippos) has often been used to remove tape residue from paper money. How do I know this? Several months back the boss bought a $1000 note with a few taped areas. He made some phone calls and using "zippo fluid" was the common answer to remove it. Then I got to experiment on it. No pressure only a thousand dollars FACE value! A slow and meticulous process that didn't work all that well. At least I didn't trash it. Next time he signs a "hold harmless" agreement.
First let me say - Charmy, I've always had the greatest respect for you, nothing will change that. And you are more than welcome to disagree with me - anytime And yeah, I know what you mean - disagreeing with me often is like beating your head against the wall. I'm used to it, have been since childhood. So why don't I change ? Well, it's usually because I end up being right. Your comment kind of reminds of when I was 14 and taking Geometry in school. Like evrybody there was at the time,I was taught that there are 12 Proofs for the Pytharorean Theorem. One of our assignments was to do all these Proofs on paper. Well, I did the12 Proofs - and then I wrote another one making 13. My teacher was livid ! Gave me dressing down like you've never seen in front of the whole class. At the end of his rant, I politely him he was wrong and I was right. That got me sent to the principal's office. To make a long story short I took my math paper to the college, to the head of the math department. Had him check my work - he accompanied me to school the next day. And he politely told my teacher that he was wrong, and that I was right. My Proof was valid. Well now today there are over 80 accepted Proofs for Pythagorean Theorem, I just looked it up. Seems I started something way back then. But that's not the point Charmy. The point is when I know I am right, I stick to my guns And that's why it's like beating your head against the wall. That said, if someone ever proves me wrong, I freely and willingly step up and admit it. The evidence of that has been shown right here on this forum many times. So Charmy, we shall have to agree to disagree. I'm OK with that ') Oils do several things to coins. Let me be more specific - copper coins. I say that because I can honestly say that I have never heard of anyone who put oil on a silver, gold, or nickel coin. It is used on copper because copper is far and away the most reactive of our coinage metals. Anything and everything seems to affect copper in a detrimental way. So people have always tried to come up with ways to stop copper from being affected by outside forces. They have done everything over the years from coating the coins with oils to shelac and varnishes. But to answer your question, oils fill in all of the minor blemishes on a copper coin and make the surface look smoother than it really is. It also adds a sheen, a gloss that mimicks the look of lustrous MS cooper that has toned chocolate brown. So even a well worn specimen appears to be nicer, to have more luster than it really does. To understand this look just take any 2similar, circulated copper coins. Put oil on one, blot off the excess and then look at them side by side. You'll readily see the difference and understand what I am saying.
I presume "carbon dioxide" means carbonate anion. Also - the acetate and formate anions may have started with organic acids, but now have formed inorganic salts which (as you pointed out) are insoluble with organic solvents. Also... who can tell us the different types of verdigris ? What is that nasty red stuff ? How can one determine which ones are static and which are still actively growing ? Why do dogs have black lips ?
Yes, carbonate salts, carbonate radicals and carbon dioxide gas. Sometimes my brain works faster than my fingers and I may not be exact in my posts. That's why my book is still in draft form and not published. LOL ...but it's getting there! Remember your chemical equalibriums my friend. It will all become clear for you soon enough. Verdigris is very complicated, there are 21 major components and a lot more minor components.
Wasn't seeking anyone's approval Jim. Just trying to put out information that others refuse to (for proprietary reasons I guess). Copper is the most common and hardest metal to deal with, which is why I point out that LF works very well w/no ill effects. (I'm referring to traditional LF like your granddad used to put in his lights..not charcoal fluid.) It urks me when the geniuses dismiss an idea simply because they think they know better. The more I point out when someone's wrong, the more likely that more people will learn on their own instead of relying on bad information. Besides..people that think they know it all are especially urksome to me. I take delight in exposing the ego driven hot air.
So far, you have done a bang up job of "exposing the ego driven hot air". Besides the chemistry you need to learn, spelling would help.
Yes the sub atomic molecular process of applying paint to a wall is always important to see that it looks great. Sorry about the spelling Thurston. I didn't do a breakdown of the english language before I posted, moreover, I spell to suit me.., my mood, maybe laziness..certainly not to please you or anyone else. Urk works great for me. Please pass the grey poupon.