GTG: 1918 Lincoln Cent.

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Morgandude11, Mar 25, 2022.

  1. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    You know the drill. Please guess the grade, color, and any special designation. Comments very welcome, as my expertise is not in Copper coinage. This is a type coin for me. **note—scratches on holder, by obverse of coin. Holder will be polished out.

    5AA34563-3C4E-4E86-BB5A-6F83CF43F384.jpeg 90A902B9-B6AA-4BCC-82FD-0F7FD287F0B1.jpeg
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. spirityoda

    spirityoda Coin Junky

  4. potty dollar 1878

    potty dollar 1878 Well-Known Member

    I'm going bold and say 66 red nice cent.
     
  5. Dave Waterstraat

    Dave Waterstraat Well-Known Member

    MS65 RD, while the obverse approaches 66 I think a couple of reverse ticks hold it to 65. (maybe)
     
  6. jtlee321

    jtlee321 Well-Known Member

    This is where I am at. It looks like 65 RB, the spots on the obverse and reverse probably limited the numerical grade and there is a touch of brown mostly on the reverse. Not sure if it exceeds the 5% to cause the RB designation, but I'd call it enough.
     
  7. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    MS 64 RB …. just an initial impression…I see one slightly larger hit on the reverse but otherwise it looks like a clean coin with nice luster
     
    Sunflower_Coins likes this.
  8. dimeguy

    dimeguy Dime Enthusiast

    The obverse looks really nice, there may be a spot just above the date that caught my eye. The reverse has the mark by the O in ONE and the carbon spot on the left wheat stalk. Distractions in the field underneath "AME" in AMERICA and between the stalks. Being as such I am going to wager a 65 RD
     
  9. Evan8

    Evan8 A Little Off Center

    Hard to tell about the color due to lighting. I will venture a guess and say 64 red.

    What I believe is a single light makes it appear brown in areas. However I know Lincolns pretty well, atleast I think I do, but I bet it's red. Not the best strike so that's why I'm going with 64.
     
  10. SensibleSal66

    SensibleSal66 U.S Casual Collector / Error Collector

    Well excuse Meeeeeeee!!!! Ya'll! I'm definitely choosing MS65 RD.:p
     
    SuperFlower likes this.
  11. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    I think that the surfaces get this coin a 65. As for Red I am not sure.
    When I opened this thread i didn't expect to see an18' look like a 58.
     
  12. Anthony Mazza

    Anthony Mazza Well-Known Member

  13. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

  14. RogerC

    RogerC Well-Known Member

    65. Red obverse, RB reverse
     
  15. expat

    expat Remember you are unique, just like everyone else Supporter

    I am at MS 65 RD. I don't think the surfaces overall warrant more. Also I think with better lighting much more original luster would be apparent. Nice coin
     
  16. Scott J

    Scott J Well-Known Member

  17. charley

    charley Well-Known Member

    Wish I had it in hand, but Giving it a shot for conversation value (and knowing the date variants strikes ), 67 RB.
    That darn spottiness that plagues 18s.....
     
  18. eddiespin

    eddiespin Fast Eddie

    Hard to tell if Goldilocks is missing detail for the shadowing. These were superbly-detailed specimens before the engravers started cutting corners. MS65 on grade, golden on color, what the hell?
     
  19. Sunflower_Coins

    Sunflower_Coins Importer and Exporter

    64RB. Pretty clean, love the luster. On the highlights, the color is too muted for red, and probably keeps it from a 65.
     
  20. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    I will post the reveal tonight. This has been a good learning experience for me in a milieu that I don’t often collect. BTW, the color is pretty accurate in the photos, though it is slightly more red in person. Flash yellows out the color a lot.
     
  21. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    Ok, the reveal. The only thing that I thought originally, and the GTG appeared to confirm is that the coin is at least one grade undergraded. The range of grades ran from 64 to 66, with most putting it around 65.
    86FCF27C-0F4E-40DA-B69B-DCBBA74B6AB7.jpeg
     
    Sunflower_Coins, expat, ddddd and 2 others like this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page