...AUTHENTICATING MY BECKERS...

Discussion in 'Ancient Coins' started by ominus1, Mar 12, 2022.

?

are these authentic Carl Becker forgeries?

Poll closed Mar 15, 2022.
  1. Yup, no doubt, these are the real McCoys...Carl Becker fakes..

    60.0%
  2. Nope, that's not enough proof to say for sure...

    20.0%
  3. ...i dont know...its according to what Doug Smith thinks...if it impresses him, then i'm impressed

    20.0%
  1. ominus1

    ominus1 Well-Known Member

    ...i might be a might prejudice on comparing my own coins with the plate coins from my books authored by Sir G.F. Hill(1925-6) so i'll put it to a vote and let you, my Peeps, decide.. are these two coins of product of the famous forger, Carl Becker?...step right up and cast your vote..(since in our hobby, a lot of the time it comes down to opinions^^) and as always....

    POST YER COINS N COMMENTS PEEPS! :) IMG_0896.JPG IMG_0897.JPG
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Mar 12, 2022
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Kentucky

    Kentucky Well-Known Member

    Not voting yet, but waiting to see what @dougsmit has to say
     
    galba68 and ominus1 like this.
  4. Hrefn

    Hrefn Well-Known Member

    Becker Fakey McFakeface. Times two. IMHO.
     
    ominus1 likes this.
  5. ominus1

    ominus1 Well-Known Member

    ..thank you gentlemen, for your input :)
     
    Hrefn likes this.
  6. romismatist

    romismatist Well-Known Member

    I don't think that the coins are Becker forgeries... Becker operated from 1806 to 1830, while I think that these are both much more modern forgeries. Both look very similar in style to the fakes of Slavey Petrov and other Bulgarian studios, although I think that Slavey produced his coins in sterling silver and these are some other type of white metal.

    You can see some of Slavey's designs here: http://www.beastcoins.com/Fakes-Altered/Fakes.htm. There don't seem to be any similar fakes on the Forum Fakes website: https://www.forumancientcoins.com/fakes/search.php .

    There are no flow marks on any of the legends and the fields are almost too perfect, which indicates that these coins were likely pressed rather than struck (also indicating a more modern origin).
     
    DonnaML and ominus1 like this.
  7. Roman Collector

    Roman Collector Well-Known Member

    They look like die-matches to the illustration in the reference book to me.
     
    ominus1 likes this.
  8. Ocatarinetabellatchitchix

    Ocatarinetabellatchitchix Well-Known Member

    I think they are Becker’s restrike. Following Becker’s death in 1830, his dies were transferred to the Berlin Museum, which used them to strike off-metal copies that were made available to museums, dealers, and collectors.
     
  9. ominus1

    ominus1 Well-Known Member

    its possible...
    ..i'm inclined to agree with you Sir! :)
    ..that's also possible...now you've gone and gonna make me read the rest of the books :D thank you for your comments gentlemen :)..when i got Hills books on Becker i didn't know the plates of the coins would be in them..
     
    DonnaML and Kentucky like this.
  10. Alwin

    Alwin Well-Known Member

    If it can help...

    Vente ELSEN 99, lot 1532:
    EMILIEN, aureus. Faux de Becker en étain (Becker 215).

    Becker Aemil.jpg
     
  11. Al Kowsky

    Al Kowsky Well-Known Member

    Of course they are genuine fakes :hilarious:. Becker made or made by someone else using Becker dies ;). Pictured below is my prize Becker fake :D.
    Hill 128, obv.JPG Hill 128, rev..JPG
    For comparison a genuine coin :happy:.

    Heliokles I (2).jpg
     
    galba68 and ominus1 like this.
  12. ominus1

    ominus1 Well-Known Member

    Last edited: Mar 13, 2022
  13. ominus1

    ominus1 Well-Known Member

    ..thanks Alwin :)
     
  14. ominus1

    ominus1 Well-Known Member

    The family used his dies to strike sets of coins in a poor quality pewter alloy, with the examples sold to collectors and institutions. At some point Becker's family sold the dies to the Saalfeld Museum, and they finally were placed into of the collection of the Kaiser-Friedrich Museum in Berlin in 1911.Nov 16, 2014
     
  15. ominus1

    ominus1 Well-Known Member

    with the evidence so far introduced, we can conclude that these are in fact reproductions made by Karl Beckers dies sometime before 1911(in fact, one may even be a plate coin of Hills). now i guess it'd be according to what type of metal was used to determine about when they were struck, along with the knowledge that since there was no apparent applied 'wear' to make the coins look weathered by time, they were not intended to deceive by fraud, 'in my opinion'...:)
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page