My first Reverse of 1989

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Spark1951, Feb 23, 2022.

  1. Spark1951

    Spark1951 Accomplishment, not Activity

    This is an update to my post of 27Dec21, when I broke into a new jar of old cents. The last date in the jar was a single cent from 1991, and since then, I have gone through over 800 cents and saved/conserved 156... this equates to a 18.77 percent rate. Many found from 1980 onward looked brand new...but most had die deterioration issues or wear.

    So, when I got to 1988, I sorted about 40 cents as Denvers. 10 of these were set aside as spenders for wear. While I was taking a break for food (my wife insists on this kind of thing), I realized I had not checked for the transitional. I checked all 40. In the spender pile I found my first.
    220223181550366.jpg

    220223181418090.jpg

    220223180916341.jpg

    It has plating issues, has AU53/55 wear, discoloration and split plating on the reverse/USA.

    1 out of 40...and I almost turned it back to the wild. I don't have a clue what value it might have, but I welcome all comments. This will not be sold...it stays in the family. My 2 sons will have to flip a coin (pun not intended) to see who gets it...Spark
     
    Last edited: Feb 23, 2022
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Snowman

    Snowman Senior Member

    Very nice find & condition - the "D" is a little more valuable. This variety is starting to take off more since it was added in the cherry pickers guide.
     
    Spark1951 likes this.
  4. Danomite

    Danomite What do you say uh-huh

    Very nice find, congrats!
     
    Spark1951 likes this.
  5. Mountain Man

    Mountain Man Well-Known Member

    Most of you know what I think of zincoln's so I know nothing of errors or varieties after 1982, so educate me. What's special about this coin?
     
  6. Danomite

    Danomite What do you say uh-huh

    It’s a transitional design variety. This particular one is for a “zincoln” but there are many others:
    http://doubleddie.com/58348.html
     
    Spark1951 likes this.
  7. Spark1951

    Spark1951 Accomplishment, not Activity

    @Mountain Man …so, if you read the info at Wexler provided by @Danomite you will see this coin is found once for every 482 that were struck, which, BTW, doesn’t mean if you search 482 1988-D cents that you will find one.

    I learned about this transitional when I joined Coin Talk on 27Oct17, I have been checking all my spare change for it for over 4 years. This one was found in a jar of coins that became full in 1991. Without the jar of coins being set aside 31 years ago, I would still be looking…

    One last note…I researched the value and found it to be worth approx. $100, according to one source dated 22Feb20…so, 2 years ago. This source also said the variety was slated to be added to the Cherry Pickers Guide in its next edition, I don’t know if a new edition is available by now.

    BUT…the source had the scarcity info backwards…the 1988 Philadelphia is twice as scarce as the Denver, so I think my coin is worth about 50 bucks.

    I hope I didn’t overwhelm you with all of this, but you did say to educate you.
    Cheers!…Spark
     
    Mountain Man and Danomite like this.
  8. Snowman

    Snowman Senior Member

    The 1988 RDV-006 is in the 6th edition Vol.1 of the Cherrypickers guide cent-nickel type. I had it for a number of years and the copyright date is 2015, so I guess it's been out since then.

    As with the RDV-006 Mountain man - here is the article that Dr James Wiles wrote to Coinworld back in 2007 about finding the first one. I had to convince him about this variety which a few collectors shot it down from the beginning that there was no such thing.

    In layman's terms- I like to say that there is a handful of different Lincoln Memorial designs and the 1988 has reverse of a 1989. To most people the design is same ever since the beginning like 1909 & 1959. Plus, most like to call this an error but it's variety. Which these pennies where stuck on purpose but the mint made a mistake on choosing the die pairs which they made a subtle design change. Hopefully the Coinworld article helps explain, plus Variety Vista could help further. Snowman
     

    Attached Files:

    Kasia, Mountain Man and Spark1951 like this.
  9. Mountain Man

    Mountain Man Well-Known Member

    Thanks.
     
    Spark1951 likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page