Looking to better understand the terminology used for 1836 Gobrecht Dollars!

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Jack D. Young, Dec 23, 2021.

  1. Jack D. Young

    Jack D. Young Well-Known Member

    I understand there were two "original" strikings of 1836 circulation Gobrecht dollars dated 1836; the 1st group of 1000 weighed the previous standard of 416 grains. They were die alignment I with the eagle flying upward.

    the 2nd group of 600 were struck at the new weight standard of 412.5 grains, die alignment IV (medal turn) with the eagle flying level.

    And in the late 1850's "restrikes" were coined for collectors including pieces dated 1836.

    My example is labeled a "Proof J-60 Restrike", from the 2nd group struck due to its die alignment and weight.

    my 1836 g$.jpg

    I was directed to a lot description from Heritage as follows:

    heritage slab.jpg
    description.jpg


    Here they refer to one like mine as "technically a restrike" (agreed) or a "second original".

    And then there is this interesting one...

    slab image.jpg

    cert image.jpg

    Eagle appears level in the slab, upward in the cert image and is labeled "Original- Medal Alignment".

    So which terminology is "correct"?

    And then the actual 1850's "restrikes", how are they designated/ labeled?
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Insider

    Insider Talent on loan from...

    Beats my five aces. I think the "experts" post on another forum. I believe there was an article in the Numismatist about these coins this year or last.
     
    john65999 likes this.
  4. johnmilton

    johnmilton Well-Known Member

    I will have to do more research as to what the latest thinking is on these coins. When I was actively looking for one, the pieces that had the eagle flying level were all called "restrikes." The pieces that had the eagle flying "onward and upward," both metal turn and coin turn, were called "original.'

    The only one that I have nailed down is if the rotation is a coin turn, with the eagle flying "onward and upward," it is an 1836 original, die rotation #1. This piece, PCGS graded PR-62, CAC, is in my collection.

    1836 G Dollar All.jpg

    Before I owned the above piece, I owned this one, which was NGC graded PR-60.

    1836 Gobrecht Dol IV All.jpg

    It was my understanding that this piece is a restrike from the 1850s.

    Concern about how the eagle is flying has caused concern with these pieces. "Onward and upward" was good; flying level was bad. It didn't help that the "Red Book" gave the level flyers second class status with words like, "Not official coins." That led dealers and auctioneers to downplay the die rotation of the coins they were offering.
     
    Marsden, Insider and Jack D. Young like this.
  5. Jack D. Young

    Jack D. Young Well-Known Member

    @johnmilton I noticed in your NGC posted example and the images in the Red Book for the 1850's "restrikes" the eagle is tilted slightly downward versus the "flying level" orientation of the "original" strikes.
     
  6. Marsden

    Marsden Well-Known Member

    Oh great. I was always vaguely aware of this type, now it's been added to the list of coins I simply must have or I'll go crazy. Mesmerizing!
     
    MIGuy and Jack D. Young like this.
  7. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    Both the slab pic and cert pic say the same thing - original. It's the pictures that are contradictory.

    I think the answer is simple and right in front of us. When a coin is slabbed, and the obv is oriented correctly with the head at 12 and date at 6, then the rev must also be oriented correctly and match the die alignment that was used when the coin was struck. And it is the die alignment that was used for striking that determines if the eagle is flying upwards or sideways. And of course when you flip a slab, if you flip it vertically and the rev is upright as it should be then the coin was struck with a coin turn, and when you flip it horizontally and the rev is upright then the coin was struck with a medal turn.

    Based on what you said in the beginning -

    That would mean this coin -

    [​IMG]


    - is from the second group of originals.


    At the same time it would mean that this picture is incorrect -

    [​IMG]


    Because rather obviously the eagle is flying level in the slab pic and the slab is definitely being held upright so it shows, and shows correctly, the way the eagle is actually flying - and it's level, not upwards as this pic shows.


    This is what coins from group 1 are supposed to look like.

    [​IMG]


    [​IMG]


    And as those pics show the eagle is definitely flying upwards. And that coin was struck with a coin turn, not a medal turn.

    Now I don't know if that answers your question or not but the two things certainly show us that somebody got that cert pic wrong in the way they depicted it. The labeling of the pic is correct, the coin is a medal turn, it's the orientation of the rev in the pic they got incorrect.
     
    Last edited: Dec 24, 2021
    micbraun and Jack D. Young like this.
  8. Jack D. Young

    Jack D. Young Well-Known Member

    Thank you for that response @GDJMSP ;helps fill in the rest of the story!

    No way to know but I wonder what the TPG was trying to accomplish with the "tilted" image...
     
  9. KBBPLL

    KBBPLL Well-Known Member

    Since the TrueView is taken outside the slab, perhaps the photographer saw it graded "original" and oriented the reverse to be "how it's supposed to look"? If I'm understanding this correctly... The nomenclature sure is confusing to someone like me who is new to these - there's either a "first' original, "second" original (1837), and restrike (1850's), OR there's "original", first restrike (1837), and second restrike (1850's)?
     
    Jack D. Young likes this.
  10. Jack D. Young

    Jack D. Young Well-Known Member

    I'm with you!

    Just saw this 1839 listed for sale, and again the PCGS True View image shows a reoriented reverse...

    1839-slab.jpg

    1839 image.jpg
     
  11. KBBPLL

    KBBPLL Well-Known Member

    And then there's this one. I'm confused, they're confused, we're all confused.
    1836_$1_combo.jpg
     
    Marshall likes this.
  12. Jack D. Young

    Jack D. Young Well-Known Member

    Made me chuckle @KBBPLL :D! Merry Christmas to you and yours.
     
    KBBPLL likes this.
  13. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    Well, I wasn't confused at until ya posted that ! :eek: LOL !

    But I think @Conder101 may be able to help explain and confirm it for us.

    Ya see, that pic is of an old slab, used 1986-89, if I am correct. I believe it is what PCGS calls Gen. 1.2, and that slab had the reverse side of the slab made upside down from the obv. So when ya turn the slab and can see the label printing upright as we see it in that pic, we're not really seeing what we think we're seeing.

    When you do a medal turn with the slab, the rev of the coin is actually going to be upside down. So if the obv was turned a bit and oriented in that slab correctly, then the rev of the coin would be upside down, because it would be turned too. And it would look like this, and it would be flying level.

    [​IMG]


    Now that's not the right slab, that's Gen. 1.2, but they -

    https://forums.collectors.com/discussion/918775/pcgs-generations-updated-6-4-21

    - don't provide a pic of Gen. 1.1 in that thread. This is a Gen. 1.1, and as you can tell the rev of the coin would be upside down.

    [​IMG]


    But they - https://www.pcgs.com/holdermuseum - don't provide a pic of the slab reverse.

    (so I had to improvise a bit) :)
     
    Jack D. Young likes this.
  14. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    Boy ! I had to do so much thinking there I almost hurt myself :D In fact I may have ! :D
     
    Jack D. Young likes this.
  15. Jack D. Young

    Jack D. Young Well-Known Member

    Made me Chuckle!
     
  16. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    Well, at my age, it's hard to stand on your head so you can see things right and type at the same time :D
     
    Jack D. Young likes this.
  17. Jack D. Young

    Jack D. Young Well-Known Member

    OK, I wrote a little humorous summary of what I learned:D...
     

    Attached Files:

    • OK.pdf
      File size:
      1.4 MB
      Views:
      97
  18. CaptHenway

    CaptHenway Survivor

    There have been many articles written about these in the Numismatist. Some of them may be right. Good luck figuring out which ones.
     
    Jack D. Young likes this.
  19. Mr.Q

    Mr.Q Well-Known Member

    I will keep my opinion to myself and standby for the results of the more experienced ones. Good luck.
     
  20. Insider

    Insider Talent on loan from...

    Are you the same Capt. from another forum? If so, this is one of the "experts" on Internet forums I referred to and I'd wish he would post here on CT more often!!!:D
     
  21. KBBPLL

    KBBPLL Well-Known Member

    I looked up the 1836 on PCGS. I thought it was funny that in previous auction sales the first one I clicked on looked like that. Did it rotate in the rattler or was the photographer also slabbing coins? :woot:

    There's a spinner thing you click on to see the other side. https://www.pcgs.com/holdermuseum/Gen1.2
     
    Jack D. Young likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page