What do you see wrong with this IHC?

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by ldhair, Dec 11, 2021.

  1. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. potty dollar 1878

    potty dollar 1878 Well-Known Member

    It's nice,what are those marks?. Screenshot_20211211-163718_Chrome.jpg
     
    capthank and Eric the Red like this.
  4. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

  5. Publius2

    Publius2 Well-Known Member

    You mean aside from the odd reddish-brown marks on the obverse which look more like they are on the slab than the coin? Two arc-shaped lines between feathers 2 and 3 and some localized spots. Those marks don't show in the first photo, only the second.

    I'm not certain it's a proof. Without doing any research on the die markers, it just doesn't look as sharply struck in the feathers as I would expect a proof to be. And the reverse also seems weak for a proof. I can't really see the edges well enough to give me some clues, even though the photos are pretty good. Secondly, unless I'm fooling myself, I think I see touches of high point breaks.

    So my first guess is that it's not a proof. My second guess is that it's a proof but a circulated one. Give me time and I'll come up with enough guesses so that all the bases are covered.
     
  6. micbraun

    micbraun coindiccted

    Exactly my thoughts… maybe not a proof, but rather a PL coin?
     
    Last edited: Dec 11, 2021
    ldhair likes this.
  7. potty dollar 1878

    potty dollar 1878 Well-Known Member

  8. potty dollar 1878

    potty dollar 1878 Well-Known Member

    Ok now i see they go with the arrow.The toning makes it hard to tell I thought they were some kind of a anomaly at first.
     
  9. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    Is that die chip above the 19 in the date?
     
  10. potty dollar 1878

    potty dollar 1878 Well-Known Member

  11. SensibleSal66

    SensibleSal66 U.S Casual Collector / Error Collector

    There isn't a Mark here. Just a penny.:hilarious:
     
    micbraun likes this.
  12. longshot

    longshot Enthusiast Supporter

    +1
    I don't know much about copper so I probably should stay out of this lol.
     
  13. Kentucky

    Kentucky Supporter! Supporter

    If not a proof, a well struck commercial...
     
  14. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    It's not a proof. Probably just an error when the label was made.
     
    longshot likes this.
  15. Matthew Kruse

    Matthew Kruse Young Numismatist

    Yep, I agree not proof. Although when I read the title, "
    What do you see wrong with this IHC"
    I was looking for something with the coin, not the label. ;)
     
  16. Mr.Q

    Mr.Q Well-Known Member

    The label seems a bit odd, but the coin looks great, in my opinion.
     
  17. wxcoin

    wxcoin Getting no respect since I was a baby

    My avatar is a red proof 1883. Compare that one with yours.
     
  18. micbraun

    micbraun coindiccted

    Can you post some pictures?
     
  19. Gilbert

    Gilbert Part time collector Supporter

    Larry, are you thinking of returning it to ANACS?
     
  20. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    No. It's too old for that.
     
  21. johnmilton

    johnmilton Well-Known Member

    When I first saw it, the word “Proof” didn’t enter my mind. It looks like a nice R&B business strike.
     
    chascat likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page