1964 D Washington Quarter Type C?

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by YankeeDime, Dec 7, 2021.

  1. YankeeDime

    YankeeDime non-conformant

    So my dad has this in his collection labeled as "1964 P 1965 RV" which I know is wrong because it's obviously a D mint mark, lol. As for a Type C? No idea, it has some circulation wear and I'm absolutely worthless at identifying varieties anyway, lol.

    The leaf detail is maybe a little better than the 1964 RV and the alignment over the A in DOLLAR looks right. The ES of STATES looks more like a Type A to me though. All I really know is it's definitely not a Type B. :bookworm:

    IMG_20211207_113006348~2.jpg IMG_20211207_114145681~2.jpg IMG_20211207_114026493~2.jpg IMG_20211207_113839802~2.jpg IMG_20211207_113811669~2.jpg
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. manny9655

    manny9655 Well-Known Member

    YankeeDime likes this.
  4. stldanceartist

    stldanceartist Minister of Silly Walks

    Sorry, it’s not a Type C reverse.
     
    YankeeDime likes this.
  5. expat

    expat Remember you are unique, just like everyone else Supporter

    It looks like a type B reverse to me. The leaves under the tail feathers have rounded tops as opposed to pointed tops on the type C. Also type C has distinct centre lines to the tail feathers where the OP coin does not. JMHO
     
    YankeeDime likes this.
  6. stldanceartist

    stldanceartist Minister of Silly Walks

    It’s not a Type B either. Just a regular worn 1964 D Type A Rev from what I see. I will share some pics of both varieties when I get home later today.
     
    YankeeDime, SensibleSal66 and expat like this.
  7. stldanceartist

    stldanceartist Minister of Silly Walks

    Okay, just getting home (with access to my image files.)

    Here are some images of Type C (Rev of 1965) reverses. Remember, these were created to accommodate for the hardness of the Cu-Ni clad metal composition, so they're going to be lower relief (flatter) in general, but with more distinctly defined edges around the shape of the leaves. It's pretty clear even on worn examples once you've seen a few.

    1964 D Washington Quarter Type C - Reverse 2.png
    1964 D Washington Quarter Type C Rev 1 - Reverse.png
    1964 D Washington Quarter Type C Rev 2 - Reverse.png
    1964 D Type C Washington Quarter - Reverse.png
    1964 D Type C Reverse Washington Quarter - Reverse.png
     
    YankeeDime and gronnh20 like this.
  8. stldanceartist

    stldanceartist Minister of Silly Walks

    And here are some images of Type B reverses (repurposed proof dies) - I've always wondered why lots of sites that show images of these point to almost every diagnostic except the most obvious one: the eagle's left (viewer's right) wingtip. It's something that stands out even on really worn examples (actually, especially on worn examples, because it starts to have a circulated cameo effect.)

    I was having trouble discerning the difference until someone over at the NGC boards, I believe, told me that was usually the easiest way to diagnose them (especially with online pictures.)

    1956 Type B Quarter - Reverse.png

    1957 Type B Reverse Washington Quarter PCGS MS66 - Reverse.png

    1958 Type B Washington Quarter 2 - Reverse.png

    1959 Washington Quarter Type B Reverse - Reverse.png

    1960 Type B Washington Quarter 1 - Reverse.png

    1964 Washington Quarter Type B Reverse - Reverse.png
     
    gronnh20, YankeeDime and expat like this.
  9. YankeeDime

    YankeeDime non-conformant

    Thanks for your help! All I could really tell was it wasn't a Type B because you could see the tips of the upper arrows the eagle is clutching. Like I said, I'm horrible at varieties, lol. At least it's still silver, lol

    Thanks again for your help everyone!
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page